Two versions of the Vacheron Constantin Historiques Cornes de Vache 1955 (both measuring 38.5 x 10.9 mm and powered by caliber 1142):
Steel Hodinkee Edition ref. 5000H/000A with Pulsometer scale (2017)
Platinum ref. 5000H/000P-B058 with Tachymeter scale (2015)
I personally prefer the platinum version for tworeasons:
First, I love the blue tachymeter scale, which is also found on my rosegold version. It's one of the reasons I decided to buy the rose gold version rather than the steel one, despite the significant price difference.
Second, the pulsometer scale has always made me feel a little uneasy because it evokes health and the medicalworld, and that's not something I personally want to wear on my wrist. Furthermore, I find it less aesthetically pleasing than the tachymeter scale with the words “GRADUATED FOR 30 PULSATIONS” taking a lot of space.
What about you?
Which is your favorite?
Best, Emmanuel
credit: @doobooloo
For the sake of a completecomparison, here are fouradditionalimages from Phillips including the regularsteel version and the rosegold one.
I find the slate grey dial easily more appealing, and despite not being a fan of the large 'Graduated....' print, I don't find any disagreement with a pulsometer scale, it's not only an occasionally helpful tool, it brings me fond memories and ideals of my mother as a medical professional, and ultimately the natural world - our own rhythm of the heart, the guiding organ of our obsessions with high horology.... 🙏🙂↕️🧡
Unless the platinum is to much heavier, that's the one I'd prefer.
By: GrouchoM : May 24th, 2026-05:31
If I want to find out a pulse using just 30 counts, I can divide the tachometer reading by two. I think the blue tachometer scale really pops in a positive way.
But would probably go with steel due to the lighter weight 🤷🏻♂️ As for Pulsometer, aesthetics aside I find it a lot more likely to use than a Tachymeter scale 😉👍🏻