Freaky good Ulysse Nardin Freak!

 By: amanico : July 5th, 2019-14:37
A 7 years old picture taken during summer holidays,  of my 13 years old Freak. 

Wow, already 13 years of common life! 

One of my keepers. This watch is pure magic. 



πŸ‘πŸ‘ [nt]

 By: M4 : July 5th, 2019-14:53
No message body

Merci, M4! [nt]

 By: amanico : July 5th, 2019-15:42
No message body

That is beautiful!...

 By: InDebtButOnTime : July 5th, 2019-18:22
and there is nothing "common" about it!. smile

Clearly! [nt]

 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-01:51
No message body

That looks like a delicious recipe. The colours in your

 By: emcquillan : July 5th, 2019-20:21
picture are amazing. What a static shot. 13 years fmdefijitely=keeper. Congratulations. 

A keeper, definitely, with my Sonata. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-01:51
No message body

Outstanding photo of an incredible timepiece.

 By: MichaelC : July 5th, 2019-20:47
If we remember back to when this watch was launched, it is even more impressive.  At the time, there was really nothing like it.  The independent movement was far from full vigor.  A newly launched timepiece of this magnitude was rare.

I certainly classify it as a true Legend in our world.

And a pioneer in the silicon adventure, too! Thanks, Michael. We are lucky to own these Freaks. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-01:52
No message body

Love the watch

 By: time4fun : July 6th, 2019-09:28
continue to enjoy for many years to come 

Merci. Be sure I will. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-09:47
No message body

Definitely a keeper!! (nt)

 By: Ronald Held : July 6th, 2019-12:20

Yes, my friend, yes. time for you to find one! [nt]

 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-15:17
No message body

If it was not to heavy to wear, then I would. Or else a Sonata. (nt)

 By: Ronald Held : July 7th, 2019-12:31

Not that heavy! [nt]

 By: amanico : July 7th, 2019-12:54
No message body

No heavier than 90 grams? (nt)

 By: Ronald Held : July 8th, 2019-12:45

I don't think so, for the Freak. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 8th, 2019-13:45
No message body

I thought that for all Freaks. (nt)

 By: Ronald Held : July 8th, 2019-14:03

The Freak One is smaller. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 8th, 2019-14:08
No message body

In size or weigjht? (nt)

 By: Ronald Held : July 9th, 2019-12:59

In size, hence in weight. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 9th, 2019-13:01
No message body

Always a beauty πŸ‘ [nt]

 By: russell996 : July 6th, 2019-15:30
No message body

Yep... I can't get rid of it, and for an almost 20 years old watch, it aged very well. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-15:31
No message body

Mine arrived in 2006, and isn’t going anywhere. [nt]

 By: russell996 : July 6th, 2019-15:33
No message body

Born in 2000, but arrived in my collection in 2006 as well! [nt]

 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-15:41
No message body

I just missed getting the Freak and instead got an early Freak 2 in 2005.

 By: russell996 : July 7th, 2019-00:55
Finding it a bit large there then started a search for the original and I was rewarded in 2006.

To me, compared to the 2, the Freak One was THE one. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 7th, 2019-01:21
No message body

Magical picture of a freakishly original watch! [nt]

 By: Horo_Traveler : July 6th, 2019-16:32
No message body

A watch and an universe apart... Unique, this Freak. Thanks, Horo Traveler. [nt]

 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-23:46
No message body

A super super watch! [nt]

 By: NoH : July 7th, 2019-08:14
No message body
Load More Comments >>