Comments:

Freaky good Ulysse Nardin Freak!

 
 By: amanico : July 5th, 2019-14:37
A 7 years old picture taken during summer holidays,  of my 13 years old Freak. 

Wow, already 13 years of common life! 




One of my keepers. This watch is pure magic. 

Best,

Nicolas

πŸ‘πŸ‘ [nt]

 
 By: M4 : July 5th, 2019-14:53
No message body

Merci, M4! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 5th, 2019-15:42
No message body

That is beautiful!...

 
 By: InDebtButOnTime : July 5th, 2019-18:22
and there is nothing "common" about it!. smile

Clearly! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-01:51
No message body

That looks like a delicious recipe. The colours in your

 
 By: emcquillan : July 5th, 2019-20:21
picture are amazing. What a static shot. 13 years fmdefijitely=keeper. Congratulations. 

A keeper, definitely, with my Sonata. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-01:51
No message body

Outstanding photo of an incredible timepiece.

 
 By: MichaelC : July 5th, 2019-20:47
If we remember back to when this watch was launched, it is even more impressive.  At the time, there was really nothing like it.  The independent movement was far from full vigor.  A newly launched timepiece of this magnitude was rare.

I certainly classify it as a true Legend in our world.

And a pioneer in the silicon adventure, too! Thanks, Michael. We are lucky to own these Freaks. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-01:52
No message body

Love the watch

 
 By: time4fun : July 6th, 2019-09:28
continue to enjoy for many years to come 

Merci. Be sure I will. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-09:47
No message body

Definitely a keeper!! (nt)

 
 By: Ronald Held : July 6th, 2019-12:20
NT   

Yes, my friend, yes. time for you to find one! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-15:17
No message body

If it was not to heavy to wear, then I would. Or else a Sonata. (nt)

 
 By: Ronald Held : July 7th, 2019-12:31
NT

Not that heavy! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 7th, 2019-12:54
No message body

No heavier than 90 grams? (nt)

 
 By: Ronald Held : July 8th, 2019-12:45
NT

I don't think so, for the Freak. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 8th, 2019-13:45
No message body

I thought that for all Freaks. (nt)

 
 By: Ronald Held : July 8th, 2019-14:03
NT

The Freak One is smaller. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 8th, 2019-14:08
No message body

In size or weigjht? (nt)

 
 By: Ronald Held : July 9th, 2019-12:59
NT

In size, hence in weight. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 9th, 2019-13:01
No message body

Always a beauty πŸ‘ [nt]

 
 By: russell996 : July 6th, 2019-15:30
No message body

Yep... I can't get rid of it, and for an almost 20 years old watch, it aged very well. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-15:31
No message body

Mine arrived in 2006, and isn’t going anywhere. [nt]

 
 By: russell996 : July 6th, 2019-15:33
No message body

Born in 2000, but arrived in my collection in 2006 as well! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-15:41
No message body

I just missed getting the Freak and instead got an early Freak 2 in 2005.

 
 By: russell996 : July 7th, 2019-00:55
Finding it a bit large there then started a search for the original and I was rewarded in 2006.





To me, compared to the 2, the Freak One was THE one. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 7th, 2019-01:21
No message body

Magical picture of a freakishly original watch! [nt]

 
 By: Horo_Traveler : July 6th, 2019-16:32
No message body

A watch and an universe apart... Unique, this Freak. Thanks, Horo Traveler. [nt]

 
 By: amanico : July 6th, 2019-23:46
No message body

A super super watch! [nt]

 
 By: NoH : July 7th, 2019-08:14
No message body
Load More Comments >>