Dr No[Moderator Omega - Wristscan]
34897
Why so little, Ed? A couple of reasons. First, the price of entry . . .
Apr 30, 2022,21:22 PM
. . . is in the five figure range. Low five figures, to be sure, but still significantly more for many than, say, Speedmaster Professionals or Seamaster Planet Oceans. In other words, it's an Omega that more will aspire to rather than start with.
As for its reputation as a wrist monster, though, my sense is that its nominal size is unnecessarily off-putting.
Here's what I wrote when the Ploprof was re-released in 2009 in remarks to Nicolas:
"I understand your doubts regarding the massive size of the Ploprof, Nicolas, but if it isn't an issue for me, it's not an issue! My preference for modesty in sizing and proportion is well established, and my disdain for trendy
large watches has been expressed more than a few times on our forums, but the aesthetic effect the Ploprof projects has to be experienced in the metal to be fully appreciated.
'Just as a symmetrical rectangular form complements a smaller wrist due to the subliminal effect of having boundaries when compared to a round case, the asymmetrical case of the Ploprof
further adds to the effect.'
'[e]ven though it took up a great deal of space on my wrist, I didn't feel as though I was wearing an overly large watch.'
"The Ploprof doesn't bear the typical hallmarks of wristwatch design, and my sense is its uniqueness is what allows the mind to appreciate it on its own merits."
To put my earlier remarks in perspective, Ed, there's a similarly large Omega I admire but could never wear, the Railmaster XXL. Its round and relatively flat form comes across like a saucer on my wrist. The Ploprof, though, while large, isn't as . . .
. . . overwhelming as the Rail is. I could wear the Ploprof without feeling there was a mismatch with my wrist.
Art