The original, of course.

Jan 09, 2020,06:14 AM
 

In the seventies, in Madrid, I won a brand new Speedmaster (first watch to the moon, etc.) playing cards.  In the eighties, I was stupid enough to trade it for a 1949 Rolex Oyster.  I’ve missed the old Speedmaster since.  Now I own a new one, the one in the big box, but it’s certainly not the same by any means.


Noticing the launch of the new 321, I’m left cold.  So many Speedmasters of all colors, sizes, and tattooed dials and backs, somehow demerits the old guy.  If only I would have kept my old Speedmaster.  





More posts: Speedmaster

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Omega Speedmaster ST 105 003 from 1963. The original, or the re edition?

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-02:53
When you see such a nice specimen like this: Credit picture: Brevetwatch. For a bit less than the re edition freshly announced... You start to wonder which one to jump on... Personally, I am very happy to see the re edition, it is a very nice one, but I w...  

Did you buy it ? [nt]

 
 By: Cpt Scarlet : January 9th, 2020-03:02

For me, the original.

 
 By: @lberti : January 9th, 2020-03:24
If i want a modern speedy, i would choose this here:

Black and Yellow

 
 By: @lberti : January 9th, 2020-03:26
...  

I would rather go for this one...

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-03:28
...  

Amazing piece.

 
 By: @lberti : January 9th, 2020-05:16
I guess those trade 18-30k?

Good idea [nt]

 
 By: Sportster : January 9th, 2020-20:23

Yeees! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-05:39

The original, of course.

 
 By: Catulle : January 9th, 2020-06:14
In the seventies, in Madrid, I won a brand new Speedmaster (first watch to the moon, etc.) playing cards. In the eighties, I was stupid enough to trade it for a 1949 Rolex Oyster. I’ve missed the old Speedmaster since. Now I own a new one, the one in the ...  

;) Good hunt! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-15:41

The original

 
 By: Boris : January 9th, 2020-08:12
And it's not even a close call. I mean, the original is not made anymore, and the new one will be there for years. An original in a good condition would easily be my pick, even if the reedition is nice.

Well I choose BOTH 😁...

 
 By: holdemchamp1225 : January 9th, 2020-08:55
I have 2 original Ed Whites Nicolas, one is pristine and untouched condition, and I am still excited to get the new re-edition as I explained in another thread. The problem with the vintage piece is replacement parts, damage, etc... That is the advantage ... 

While I appreciate vintage watches and have done so for many years, I find that I like to wear my watches and often times in rough situations....

 
 By: holdemchamp1225 : January 9th, 2020-09:07
so for me I prefer modern watches more than vintage watches. I guess I am more an enthusiast who likes to wear a variety or watches than a collector who has more focus or has a theme for their collection 🤷‍♂️🤪

If I had the 2020 edition, I'd still want . . .

 
 By: Dr No : January 9th, 2020-12:15
. . . the '63. On the other hand, if I had the '63, I could easily do without the current edition. ...  

I still say both 😁 [nt]

 
 By: holdemchamp1225 : January 9th, 2020-13:41

LOL! [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 9th, 2020-13:43

A "stardust" Ed White !! [nt]

 
 By: DrStrong : January 10th, 2020-22:38

Yes! ;) [nt]

 
 By: amanico : January 10th, 2020-23:34