. . . is that it's a prototype from one of Omega's contracted dial makers. The missing markers between 5 and 7 are the main indication it's not a dial that made it onto a production chronometer as Omega's QC would never allow such an obvious error to slip...
. . . which led me to believe it was produced in the late '40s by one of Omega's contractors. I don't recall seeing that dial configuration before, though, and for that matter, don't recall any rg chronometers without a full read-out of minute tracks. I'l...
. . . which didn't include a ref 2364 with your dial. There's two vaguely similar in the section devoted to ref 2364, but with out punched markers and vacated minute track. There's scant doubt in my mind that the dial of your 2364 was produced contemporan...
Hi all forumers, I am a bit late to the party due to time difference... IMO this is most probably a legitimate variant of a 2364 dial As Art has already mentioned there is a similarly designed (though different) dial vaiant with similarly embossed hour ma...
This feature is something that has been seriously compromised and physically diminished in the age of Quartz timepieces where one does not need to do too many adjustments…