kkochheiser
1078
Okay, I’m late to this one...
But when someone says “vintage Seamaster” the CK is what leaps to my mind's eye. And that one is a beauty!
Kent
Omega Seamaster 300 ST 165 024 or CK 2913. How do you like it?
Ok, getting both is the way to go, here, as they are very different ( case, dial, hands, bezel, crown, lugs ). Bu if you had to choose only one, which one would be your favorite? I would go for the straight lugs, so for the CK 2913. You? Best, Nicolas ...
I would also go for the CK2913
But you have to admit the asymmetrical, lyre lugs case is very powerful and tends to sit very well on the wrist. This is very much the case with the Speedmaster, which I know better than these Seamaster. I need to explore that route a little more...
CK-2913 for me please!
I'm loving the trilogy re-edition, but that original is a bomb!
As a one watch, ck wins out for me. I love the old RM. Elegance + warm colours.
The big triangle channels all the cool of a milsub/explorer dial.
Yes and no. If it is an iconic model that I have coveted for years like a Speedmaster, Daytona, etc...then yes I would consider adding a vintage model...
but if not, then I would prefer their modern iterations due to less hassle and worry 🤷♂️. You know me, I prefer modern and contemporary watches over vintage due to ownership experience 😉🤷♂️🤦♂️
Honestly, the DSA was NEVER even on my radar until I tried yours on...
but I must admit it is AWESOME and I really do see one in my future at some time or another. Of course my preference is the US edition 😉 Now let's try and see what we can do to push JLC into making the red dial version you proposed earlier as I would be f...
Indeed 😉. Like I said, I am NOT a vintage guy UNLESS I think it is an ICON in my eyes or just extremely compelling due to design or charm 😁
I also have to see myself wearing it or it's just not worth the trouble 🤷♂️
Okay, I’m late to this one...
But when someone says “vintage Seamaster” the CK is what leaps to my mind's eye. And that one is a beauty! Kent
