BDLJ
4653
Thanks Stephen
Thanks for that info. I haven't seen any caseback shots of the original.
So are you guys doing weights so your arms can support this watch? Or is that why they made it in Ti?
Unwearable?
By: BDLJ : January 20th, 2009-19:38
Saw some wristshots on another forum. Hilariously large. I've got a depth guage that is smaller! One question for the Experts: this has a caseback attached via screws, what did the original have?
No probs mate!
By: BluNotte : January 21st, 2009-05:32
The only major difference between the original and this re-edition is that between the space that says Officine Panerai and Firenze it is blank on the original, while this one has the miale engraved. Well well, for me i'm asian and pretty slim, and NO i'm...
All Cool
By: BDLJ : January 21st, 2009-16:02
I definitely understand why you Panerai fans like this piece, it's just amusing as an actual wristwatch. The reason I asked about the caseback is that I cannot fathom why Panerai (or anyone, for that matter) use display backs on a so-called Tool watch. Ju...
Never heard of that.
By: BDLJ : January 21st, 2009-19:51
That's pretty faithful. Pity about the mini-sub, didn't think the Egyptian navy used them! Interesting that these were originally commissioned (I think) in 1956. So the start of the Suez Crisis. What did the Nacy use them for, sinking ships to block the h...