destrodan
509
Fair question, but by the same measure was a Rolex a Rolex back then?
May 28, 2020,16:53 PM
To play devil's advocate, vertical integration is a relatively new concept for the watchmaking industry so much of the 20th century was a cobbling together of various outsourced parts (in Rolex's case, we have suppliers C.R. Spillman SA, Genex, Gay Freres, Singer, Lemrich, Beyeler, Stern, Virex et Joli Poli, Boninchi, Aegler/Borel movements, among others). It was only starting in the early 1990s onward that vertical integration occurred for Rolex let alone other watch companies.
In short, most of the watchmaking industry was outsourced to each other.
At the end of the day, though, Panerai, as the executor of the request, created Panerai. Just like Wilsdorf created Rolex. Even if they had underlying suppliers.
Although not always successful, I try to look at watchmaking history the same way those who lived through it would have, and did approach the question.
Under either scenario (Rolex created the dial and placed "Panerai" on it or Panerai created the dial and it was assembled with the watch), Rolex must have been comfortable with the end-creation being largely credited to Panerai or they wouldn't have been happy with such a dial making it onto 'their' watch.
That said I would love to hear others' thoughts on this suggestion (rebuttals, etc).