Very nice looking watch for sure!

Mar 11, 2019,15:25 PM
 

i think it would look great in a steel or preferably a titanium case instead. As Bruno mentioned bronze is more of a fun watch and not for this kind of movement/complication.


Reason why it feels smaller than 44mm is due to the busy dial and Internal subdials. These definitely affect the visual aspect of the watch and make it look smaller. Also bronze being a yellow metal blends in once strapped on the wrist and also feels smaller.

As for the movement, it is definitely a marvel. Would love to wind it up and strap it on wink
Speaking of which, is the winding mechanism smooth or hard?


  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

SIHH 2019: A review on the Montblanc 1858 Split Second Bronze.

 
 By: amanico : March 11th, 2019-04:26
At the SIHH, this year, there were a few watches which deeply impressed me: The Jaeger-Lecoultre Gyrotourbillon 5, the Girard Perregaux La Esmeralda in white gold, the Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Twinbeat and... This Montblanc 1858 Split Second! Le...  

Nice review! I would prefer it in Titanium. You are right though...

 
 By: ZeroHour : March 11th, 2019-04:48
This watch is close to perfect, and at this price a no brainer! Sincerely and Respectfully Joseph

This is probably the best 1858 so far.

 
 By: Gelato Monster : March 11th, 2019-05:54
Do you think it will have good manufacturing standard and reliable vs problematic like the 1858 Tach?

the snail dial is perfect match with bronze/warm metal

 
 By: Gelato Monster : March 26th, 2019-07:52
strange for me who is almost always prefer white metal

Another winner for Montblanc.

 
 By: TheMadDruid : March 11th, 2019-06:52
They’re doing amazing things with their chronographs. Maybe it feels smaller than its true size because you are used to a big chronograph (1858) and you probably expected a rattrapante to be bigger. Anyway, this should be the split for you.

Bronze??

 
 By: Bruno.M1 : March 11th, 2019-07:58
is good for fun watches (Tudor, some IWC and heck even the overpriced Panerai) But when looking at a fantastic movement and even a split second, the grail among chronographs.... I think bronze is a mediocre material and for me not good enough I would dema... 

Very nice looking watch for sure!

 
 By: Makilla : March 11th, 2019-15:25
i think it would look great in a steel or preferably a titanium case instead. As Bruno mentioned bronze is more of a fun watch and not for this kind of movement/complication. Reason why it feels smaller than 44mm is due to the busy dial and Internal subdi... 

Whoa, that movement is insane!

 
 By: jleno : March 11th, 2019-18:04
And incredible value for a split seconds chrono as well. Perhaps this qualifies as the ultimate "stealth bomber" watch?

Another marvel definitely..

 
 By: Echi : March 11th, 2019-23:46
I do have this nagging question.. Given the size of the movement, would it have been possible to house it in a smaller case? Or will doing so awkwardly affect aesthetics? To match the elegant movement, I agree with the majority regarding the use of white ... 

Wonderful review, my friend!

 
 By: Watcholic_id : March 13th, 2019-02:54
the movement is magnificent. and i really like the dial, gorgeous! unfortunately the size of the case is quite huge & thick due to the size of the movement nevertheless, it's still a superb watch. thanks for the fantastic review, Nico cheers

Thanks for the detail reviews.

 
 By: mj23 : March 15th, 2019-16:58
Really enjoyed reading it. It’s a true feast for the eyes! I do also hope they will release SS or titanium models in the near future. And I think they will! This one is too good to just release it once.

Fully agreed with you on the case material, Nico!

 
 By: KMII : March 28th, 2019-00:06
My clear preference would be titanium. I guess the thicker bezel makes the watch look a bit smaller, like you mentioned - so not a killer for me. Like you I hope for a different case material first 👍🏻