Bounce781
4731
Thanks Samer.
Appreciate your thoughts!
The tribute to 1958 LE is not really to my taste (I got to trial the prototype at an JLC Dinner). The True Second holds my interest.
Cheers
Nice watch but!
By: Saz : October 30th, 2017-05:38
Hi Tim, We I am not an expert in watches but I have the JLC universal time and the re-edition of the 1958 geophysic watch that is not a true second. I can tell you that I chose the universal time because it was an innovation to have a true second( I know ...
These are just my opinions
By: Tim_M : October 30th, 2017-07:13
I'm not an expert in watches, either. The Tribute to 1958 was handled more delicately than the True Second. Its proportions and details do make a difference, and many will consider it a cleaner effort than any Master Control with a date or the True Second...
Sorry Tim
By: Saz : October 30th, 2017-08:38
Hi Tim I thought I was answering the person who wrote the post. I agree 100%with you concerning the feel and design of the geophysic 1958. And agree also that the true second is an anodyne watch altogether! Best, Samer
If you love it go for it!
By: Saz : November 1st, 2017-21:29
Hi! The taste is watches is so personal. If the true second holds your interest go for it! It’s a very innovative watch, the mechanism is superbe. And it can fool lots of people on wether it is a quartz or an automatic! I won a few bets on it😉! Wish you t...
It’s really grown on me.
By: Plexi : October 30th, 2017-20:31
I’ve had one for a year now and really love it. I feel like it fills a great slot for me, owning mainly sport watches. It really can do double duty as a dressier watch but looks great with jeans as well. The thickness of the case is a plus for me as it fe...
I am a owner
By: benlee338 : November 1st, 2017-08:59
Yeah, not a popular model in this forum or anywhere for that matter because it really is very plain looking watch. In fact, it looks really dull compare with my other attention grabbing APs, Rolex or Pateks or even JLC's own Duometre. There is no brightly...