I must admit that I thought the same and was an extreme traditionalist (wouldn't look at anything 'modern' ) until I tried a Urwerk 103 in the metal in Basel. Extremely wearable and attractive on the wrist in case you haven't tried it. I agree that some more extreme, newer concepts have become a little too extreme and resemble more sculptures. But sometimes you have to over-shoot to make a point and drive innovation and then go back to make it acceptable to mainstream. But at least these avantgard innovators make an effort to think 'future' and not only past - I really don't think just adding a 2nd, 3rd or 4th Tourbillon into a watch or tributing to vintage watches isn't really innovation. But don't get me wrong - I overall also prefer 50/60s vintage and thinks it's the peak of watchmaking. The whole point I want to make is that I personally either prefer the original and authentic real thing or want something really innovative/new...nothing which is neither nor