chippyfly
667
Does size matter now?
In a UK national newspaper today there is a long article about sexism in watches raised by an AD. Instead of men's watches and ladies watches, they should only be referred to by the case sizes. The article pointed out that several female "celebrities" wear 40mm+ watches and "even" a male one wears 27mm. In future the AD will only offer watches for sale as small, medium and large sizes. To do otherwise is sexist and discriminatory. That will make browsing for watches more difficult!
Are we now going to see a return to the more manageable watch sizes of the 1950's to 1980's? I hope so. After all, the skill of watchmaking is in the squeezing of complications into small spaces. "Anybody" could put a complicated movement into 45mm x 15mm case but not so into a 33mm x 9mm case.
Discuss!
Lovely Reverso.
HAGE! Clive
Reverso Classique from the 90s
„Are you man enough for a small watch“ was the title of a NYT article 5y ago. So, obviously I am. ;-) Gotta love the original Reverso size. This is a Classique model from 1995 in white gold on a custom CF strap. ...
Lovely watch that one.
Nothing wrong with the Classique size it looks fine on the wrist. Here’s mine. Regards Kev. ...
Great one
And nothing wrong at all. But I wish JLC would listen and not release all the nice homages (like the tribute to 1931) in (in my opinion) unwearable sizes. But obviously I‘m in the minority with this opinion as I also think my 38.5mm Omega Seamster is a ta...
Does size matter now?
In a UK national newspaper today there is a long article about sexism in watches raised by an AD. Instead of men's watches and ladies watches, they should only be referred to by the case sizes. The article pointed out that several female "celebrities" wea...
Great question
And I totally agree but in the same topic JLC is actually marketing the medium Reverso (which ironically is even a bit bigger than the Classique) as a ladies watch.
