Absolutely!

Apr 02, 2021,07:10 AM
 

No message body

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Reverso Classique from the 90s

 
 By: johnnymoped : April 2nd, 2021-01:07
„Are you man enough for a small watch“ was the title of a NYT article 5y ago. So, obviously I am. ;-) Gotta love the original Reverso size. This is a Classique model from 1995 in white gold on a custom CF strap. ...  

23 x 38

 
 By: johnnymoped : April 2nd, 2021-03:18

Lovely watch that one.

 
 By: kev09 : April 2nd, 2021-03:39
Nothing wrong with the Classique size it looks fine on the wrist. Here’s mine. Regards Kev. ...  

Great one

 
 By: johnnymoped : April 2nd, 2021-07:17
And nothing wrong at all. But I wish JLC would listen and not release all the nice homages (like the tribute to 1931) in (in my opinion) unwearable sizes. But obviously I‘m in the minority with this opinion as I also think my 38.5mm Omega Seamster is a ta... 

Does size matter now?

 
 By: chippyfly : April 2nd, 2021-05:36
In a UK national newspaper today there is a long article about sexism in watches raised by an AD. Instead of men's watches and ladies watches, they should only be referred to by the case sizes. The article pointed out that several female "celebrities" wea... 

Great question

 
 By: johnnymoped : April 2nd, 2021-07:19
And I totally agree but in the same topic JLC is actually marketing the medium Reverso (which ironically is even a bit bigger than the Classique) as a ladies watch.

Small is beautiful.

 
 By: amanico : April 2nd, 2021-06:41
...  

Absolutely!

 
 By: chippyfly : April 2nd, 2021-07:10

Thanks, Chippy.

 
 By: amanico : April 2nd, 2021-08:58

Love them

 
 By: johnnymoped : April 2nd, 2021-07:20
Especially the vintage seconde centrale. Very nice!