...that was most eagerly anticipated from a personal perspective. Heck, you owe it to us to dissect the philosophical underpinnings of this piece! Let's face it; who is better placed to tell us whether Hegel would have thought the aesthetics ideal, or whether Habermas would 'swallow' it?
Would Kant have described the watch as phenomenon or noumena? Is there an ontological rationale for the existence of the watch - Beat can conceive of it, so it must exist??? Would it have stumped Stumpf? C'mon, chum, let rip!
Cheers,
pplater.