While the post offers an interesting perspective on brand engagement, I believe it draws a flawed parallel between the music industry and the watch industry. While there are similarities in the importance of community and connection, the two fields operate in fundamentally different ways. While I have respect for a fellow journalism colleague such as Ariel Adams, whom I've seen dozens of times all over the world all over the years, it is clear Ariel Adams is creating content and supporting an argument that is deeply flawed here.
Key Differences:
While the post highlights the importance of community engagement for watch brands, drawing a direct parallel to the music industry oversimplifies the complexities of both fields. Effective brand engagement in the watch industry requires a tailored approach that recognizes the unique nature of the product and the expectations of collectors. Music is different. Music can be consumed/experienced in an expensive concert with food and drink and music can be consumed for free by a free download. A watch event does not have that free download to give that same consumption/experience.
To compare watch community engagement and to compare music community engagement is comparing apples with oranges. Not even in the same family.