The JLC

Oct 20, 2019,06:28 AM
 

Reverso is my choice for a dress watch among the three.

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Three On Three: Dress watches

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 19th, 2019-05:53
Left to Right #1 Chopard L.U.C 1860, 16/1860/2 #2 Patek Philippe Calatrava, 3796S #3 Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Ultra Thin Tribute To 1931, Q2788570 Which one do you choose? ...  

I like the three of them but if one only...

 
 By: Mike H : October 19th, 2019-06:18
...personally I don’t hesitate and go for the nice candy 3796. Small is beautiful 😉

3796

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 19th, 2019-22:06
In recent years, the rating of 3796 has been increasing. Especially WG. In Chrono24, 3796 in good condition was reduced.

Reverso

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:19
The great thing about this Reverso is its simplicity, thinness, and the original caliber 822.

It's

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:20
a very interesting opinion. I want to know your sensibility that showed the order!

More of a matter of taste than sensibility, I guess: the fact it’s a charming limited edition I wasn’t aware of from my favorite brand gives Patek the first spot...

 
 By: FabR : October 21st, 2019-03:57
The second place for JLC then was probably just a matter of aesthetic appeal, of the dial in particular, even though I do like Chopard as a brand😉Cheers.

Salmon dial is not very popular in Japan.

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-04:51
However, I like this 3796S, which is not a dial color that everyone accepts like silver, black or blue. I mean I'm a pervert! Haha.

Thanks!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : January 2nd, 2020-01:31
I'm grad !!

ケース型的にはショーパルですね。

 
 By: 中野れい : October 19th, 2019-07:28
文字盤も針もいいけど日付はだめですね 😆 それがなければ完璧だと思います。だからパテックにします。秒針も乗せるとこがいい(ジャーガーはクラシックモデルだけどシンプルすぎ)... I prefer the Patek as the balance is perfect. ... 

Good to hear 😊

 
 By: 中野れい : October 19th, 2019-18:46
Thank you

✌️ [nt]

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:40

Haha,

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:25
😎👍

On the contrary,

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:25
I respected the consideration of the brand that made it easier to use everyday by putting the date on the dress watch. Why did they not develop a hand-wound and two-hands movement that was easy to develop? They would have aimed for practicality by ensurin... 

Handwound is a bit troublesome sometimes 😆😃

 
 By: 中野れい : October 21st, 2019-05:34
Especially for daily wear...

Ummm

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : January 2nd, 2020-01:30
Certainly, yes... So I like 1860 automatic with date function.

As a "dress" watch...

 
 By: watchme : October 19th, 2019-08:02
the Reverso - all the way! Why? A rectangular watch peeking out - and parallel to - a shirt cuff is about as elegant as you can get. I find round watches look like half-moon (clumsy). -Dean

Great!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:27
The great thing about Reverso is its elegance, sporty and iconic.

Yes, it's a true!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:28
But if you know why Chopard developed 1.96 in the 90s, your opinion will change.

Hsrd, but the Chopard. (nt)

 
 By: Ronald Held : October 19th, 2019-12:19
NT

Hmmm!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:30
I feel so too!

1st place for the 1931, 2nd place for the 1931, third place for the 1931.

 
 By: Reuven Malter : October 19th, 2019-13:23
This piece is one of my favorite pieces and it reminds me of the time when i first became interested in watches.

!!!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:32
Here too enthusiastic Reverso lovers!

Enthusiastic Reverso lovers are here!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:31
I don't hate you! haha!😂

PP is so traditional!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:33
The 3796 is a great model that played a tribute to the 96. And practical.

That 3796

 
 By: batholith : October 19th, 2019-16:45
is such a rare beast that I could only go for it. And beautiful, as well.

Rare 3796

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:34
Now 3796 is very rare. I highly appreciate 3796 and 1860, which are both waterproof and transparent.

Rare and beautiful and

 
 By: batholith : October 21st, 2019-03:00
I did not know about water resistance. Wow!

Waterproof

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-04:48
96 was not waterproof, but 3796 and 5196 are equipped with daily life waterproof function. The same applies to 1860.

Perfect

 
 By: batholith : October 21st, 2019-12:40
watches in that case. Thoroughly wearable.

Thx

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : January 2nd, 2020-01:36
Thanks so happy!

REVERSO [nt]

 
 By: Brandon Skinner : October 19th, 2019-17:37

!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:35
Here too enthusiastic Reverso lovers!!

Chopard 1.96 wins for me!

 
 By: iwolf81 : October 20th, 2019-05:57
Flip them over and ask the question again. With its visible, superbly finished micro rotor movement, it’s no contest. Best, Ira

Correct!

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:36
If I open the backside championship, 1.96 will be a victory!

The JLC

 
 By: riverside / Henry : October 20th, 2019-06:28
Reverso is my choice for a dress watch among the three.

Amaze

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:37
I am amazed at how many Reverso enthusiasts are surprised and at the same time feel the greatness of Reverso.

I think I would go for the Reverso 1931

 
 By: Mr.Gatsby : October 20th, 2019-07:19
The Patek I have some worry that it will look overly small on the wrist, even though it is stunning to look at. The 1931 Reverso however, wouldn’t give me that worry. It’s well proportioned and what a classic looking piece.

Classic and original.

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:39
The model that pursued them is this Reverso and 3796. Your indication is very relevant!

Of the three Patek all the way

 
 By: watch-er : October 20th, 2019-10:52
The 3796 is to me the perfect dress watch. At 30.5mm it is perfectly legible and well protected on any wrist and can worn anywhere. Most larger watches are really just larger cases with a lot empty space as the basic size construction of watch movements h... 

You are a true watch lover

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : October 21st, 2019-02:42
You have all told about the splendor of 3796. But 215 aesthetics are disappointing.

OK… I'm interpreting the question as which would you chose to own for this purpose, not: which is the best dress watch. So…

 
 By: halgedahl : October 21st, 2019-12:05
For me, the LUC, hands down. Why? It is clearly the most versatile of the three, and at my age and station I need that versatility. Then, the JLC, and finally the Patek. HOWEVER… The Patek is clearly the most "perfect" statement pictured. It is just freak... 

As you say.

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : January 2nd, 2020-01:36
I use the most versatile LUC most often. And I recently got a second LUC1860.

Most beautiful

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : January 2nd, 2020-01:37
3796 is the most complete dress watch...

Reverso every time for me!!

 
 By: everso : October 22nd, 2019-05:45
Timeless and just magical!

Reverso came from sports and dress.

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : January 2nd, 2020-01:39
Reverso combines the opposite elements and is elegant and active.

All 3 are so uniquely special

 
 By: heljestrand : October 22nd, 2019-07:36
.....but...... My head says the Patek which is such a legacy timepiece; however the Chopard appeals to me the most and I would say that I would happily wear it for the rest of my life and pass it down as well as an heirloom. Karl-Friedrich Scheufele is on... 

You are me...

 
 By: bleu.blau.blue : January 2nd, 2020-01:41
Because, the dress watch I value the most is the LUC 1860 original. The reason is your opinion.