I think it's 1 of 2.

Dec 28, 2019,22:17 PM
 

The other specimen is just a diff color indices if I am not mistaken.

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

Jaw-dropping, really ...

 
 By: kjkt3 : December 28th, 2019-16:40
...  

Slack-jawed . . .

 
 By: Dr No : December 28th, 2019-17:00
. . . in So Cal. Literally. Art

Wow.that is gorgeous

 
 By: Gelato Monster : December 28th, 2019-21:19
But

The Seller, as they always do, make every piece look desirable.

 
 By: Jay (Eire) : December 28th, 2019-17:21
I don’t think I’ve seen any pictures of theirs where I didn’t think “yum, I want that”. So credit where credit is due. $1m Daniels. 1 of 1. Probably no bad angles for pictures of this one.

I think it's 1 of 2.

 
 By: nwk00 : December 28th, 2019-22:17
The other specimen is just a diff color indices if I am not mistaken.

Yes that is correct.

 
 By: Bounce781 : December 28th, 2019-23:43
White and a Blue ! Set of 2

Wow! [nt]

 
 By: Bounce781 : December 28th, 2019-23:44

because it says 'Daniels' on the dial

 
 By: Bruno.M1 : December 29th, 2019-01:25
put another name on it and it won't get all the fuss. Not a bad watch but without the name nothing special either. And for my taste it's WAY too small, the width is what ? 1.5 to 2 cm ?

There are worse examples, Bruno. Take, for example, this weirdly shaped steel thing with a blue dial with Patek on the dial, priced at the level of a " grande " complication.

 
 By: amanico : December 29th, 2019-01:28
Don't you think that if it had Timex on the dial, it would be priced at the same level? Best, nicolas

It sure is something special. Wouldn’t go for this model to be honest

 
 By: Watchonthewrists : December 29th, 2019-01:41
But its a great piece of horological history

Gorgeous.

 
 By: VMM : December 29th, 2019-02:30
I like the way it looks, regardless of what it says on the dial. Vte

The tourbillon ...

 
 By: kjkt3 : December 29th, 2019-03:31
...  

Case back II.

 
 By: kjkt3 : December 29th, 2019-03:56
...