74hk
43
I've been hunting this ww.tc small seconds for years...
There is just one minor flaw to my eyes which is the length of the hands. When compared side by side with the minute hand of the ww.tc chronograph the length of the minute hand on the ww.tc chronograph seems to be just right whereas on the small seconds the minute hand seems to be a tad too long as it slightly protrudes in the sphere of the 24 hour ring. It's really a minor flaw, but somehow I can't get over it to the point that I would pull the trigger. Otherwise it is after all these years still one of the most beautiful world timers in the market right next to PP5110 and JLC Geophysic Universal Time.
World Time by Girard Perregaux: 1966 WW TC versus WW TC Small Seconds.
Here is the picture: WW TC Small Seconds on the Left, 1966 WW TC on the right. 41 mm big and 11 mm high for the WW TC Small Seconds, 40 mm big and 12 mm high for the 1966 WW TC. Here, I would love to see the dial of the WW TC in the 1966, as I prefer the ...
WWTC Small Seconds
all the Time! I find the 1966 too elegant, too refined for a traveller watch! The Small Second is much more sportier and versatile for this purpose! Yours, Adam ...
I've been hunting this ww.tc small seconds for years...
There is just one minor flaw to my eyes which is the length of the hands. When compared side by side with the minute hand of the chronograph the length of the minute hand on the chronograph seems to be just right whereas on the small seconds the minute ...
