
Cozmopak's original post sparks a vital discussion on aesthetic judgment versus horological innovation, using the Akrivia x Louis Vuitton collaboration as a focal point. This article delves into the community's nuanced reactions, exploring the tension between design preferences and the underlying mechanical mastery. Cozmopak challenges collectors to maintain critical perspectives, ensuring brands continue to push creative boundaries.

Such a great looking RG 👌🏻😘. I think the new Akrivia/LV collab isn’t that bad , maybe a few adjustments on the dial and case/lugs and its better looking imho but I really like the complication.
...love Rexhep, and understand making money, but still bewildered...
I am not a huge fan of LV watches in general . But sometimes i dislike a watch when seeing a picture of it and then when i see it on the wrist i love it . At the end it doesn’t matter anyway because its not in reach for me 😬
But I think discussing the effort is important. Collectors need to be critical. If we begin to blindly applaud every effort, however meaningless, brands will lose their incentive to remain creative.
I feel much, much better now. ( ̄_, ̄ )
But it is a chronograph sonnerie tourbillion, with the sonnerie chronograph run on a second geartrain that has a constant force mechanism. So, it's a watch I don't like that has a lot of horology that is interesting in theory. And I'm glad if Rexhep makes a bit of money or a future investor or something.
This thread is active on the Independents forum with 25 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →