Vacheron Constantin Boutique Visit: Reference Guide
Reference Guide

Vacheron Constantin Boutique Visit: Reference Guide

By Chronometer (aka yacomino) · Mar 12, 2023 · 26 replies
Chronometer (aka yacomino)
WPS member · Vacheron Constantin forum
26 replies3268 views2 photos
f ๐• in ๐Ÿ’ฌ โœ‰ ๐Ÿ”—

Chronometer (aka yacomino) shares an exclusive look at the Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Twin Beat Perpetual Calendar, a timepiece that consistently captivates collectors with its intricate design. His firsthand account from a VC boutique visit offers a rare glimpse into the watch's impressive presence. This article synthesizes community reactions, providing context and deeper insights into why this particular reference resonates within the horological world.

I Will admit this traditionnelle open work calendar is quite impressive in the flesh.  This one was sold.  I came out empty handed for now โ˜บ๏ธ





Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
GW
GWIS
Mar 12, 2023

I really love the open faced Traditional. It looks like it has a lot of depth in the โ€œdialโ€. There isnโ€™t a seconds hand though is there, so are any of the moving parts visible on the dial side? All the best, Jon

AU
AuHavrePro
Mar 13, 2023

Both are peak VC - just like the CdV, Overseas and 1921.... The reason why VC has always been a very close second in my heart to JLC.... Looking forward to seeing which one you choose next! Thanks for the pictures, Filip

SH
shafran
Mar 13, 2023

And the lack of anything moving drove me crazy, otherwise a beautiful watch

SH
shafran
Mar 13, 2023

It also is available at discount on the secondary market. Beautiful dress watch, but I agree an open face needs movement for me to be enamored. I would look down and see none. Fit well.

PA
patrick_y
Mar 13, 2023

It was beautiful indeed. But I passed on it. I wanted a simpler watch.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Vacheron Constantin forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →