
Clueless_Collector's original post sparks a fascinating debate among collectors: the preference for time-only watches with or without a seconds hand. This discussion delves into the aesthetic and functional considerations that drive these choices, highlighting how subtle design elements can profoundly impact a watch's appeal. Readers will gain insight into the nuanced perspectives of seasoned enthusiasts regarding dial purity, legibility, and the artistry of minimalist horology.


My 1815 is the HG, the lighting condition can make it look like YG or RG 😊 Thanks kindly
For me when it comes to two and three handed dress watches, the important factor is the elegance of the case and the dial. The hands, the numerals, the shape of the lugs all matter possibly more than the number of hands.
Hence the recent Patek Philippe 6119 was phrased as “Simplicity is difficult”
destroyed the watch. 39mm is ok for a dress watch but those lugs have made the watch wear even larger.
Always two sides on a coin, some see Heads, some see Tails.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 44 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →