26 replies2403 views4 photos
jlc.thomsen shares a captivating 'weekend mood' post, showcasing his rare Rolex GMT OCC and a recently serviced 1936 Omega. His reflections on the Watches and Wonders new releases, contrasted with the enduring appeal of vintage timepieces, resonate deeply within the collector community. This article delves into the fascinating discussion surrounding the Omega's movement and reference, highlighting the complexities and historical nuances that make vintage collecting so engaging.
Key Points from the Discussion
- The Omega reference CK 859 is unusually documented with three different movements: cal 23.4, cal 26.5 SOB (subsidiary seconds), and cal 30T2. This makes identifying the correct movement for a specific CK 859 challenging.
- If the movement is marked 'cal 23.4 SC' (seconds central), it suggests a central seconds configuration, which conflicts with the CK 859 typically being a subsidiary seconds reference. This discrepancy raises questions about potential modifications or unique early production variants.
- jlc.thomsen theorizes that parts of his Omega's movement might have been modified or replaced during a restoration, potentially using components from a central seconds reference while retaining the original movement number on the bridges.
- A vintage shop owner reported that Omega's heritage department can be inconsistent, citing an instance where archives confirmed a '23.4 SC' movement for a 1939 CK 859 with a central seconds dial, despite the reference typically being subsidiary seconds.
- The discussion highlights the difficulty in definitively authenticating vintage Omega movements and references, especially when historical records or common knowledge present conflicting information.
Advertisement
Continue the conversation
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →