Rolex Submariner 6536/1 vs. 5508 Comparison
Reference Guide

Rolex Submariner 6536/1 vs. 5508 Comparison

By Le Monde Edmond · Sep 26, 2013 · 26 replies
Le Monde Edmond
WPS member · Rolex forum
26 replies18783 views6 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Le Monde Edmond presents a detailed comparison of two iconic Rolex 'small crown' Submariner references, the 6536/1 and the 5508. This post meticulously highlights their subtle yet significant differences, offering invaluable insights for collectors interested in these vintage 'James Bond' era timepieces.

26 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →




We are surprised this has not been done before. A comparison of two Iconic Rolex submariner models also known as the small crowns. Both are so similar but yet so different at the same time. Although there are more than two references of the small crowns submariners -also sometimes known as the 'James Bond models' (collectors often refer to all submariner without crown guards to James Bond models), we will be concentrating on only two in this post: The 6536/1 and the 5508. The 6536/1 came along after the 6536 which was only produced for one year in 1955 and was clearly a transitional model for Rolex. The 6536-1 was introduced in 1955 and ended in 1959- although it is unclear of the ending year is accurate. The 5508 came later than the 6536/1 and was introduced in 1957 for four years with production ending in 1961. The 5508 was the last submariner to carry the 100m depth rating (it would increase later to 200m). Both references are similar in size and both the 5508 and 6536/1 have small crowns (6mm) and have no crown guards. The diameter of the dial is also the same size. Lets look more closely at both models starting with the bezel.




The bezel on the 6536/1 is different than on the 5508-especially with the early models. Early models were known to have the markers in 10 minute intervals and also had a red triangle (see picture above). Later models of the 6536/1 then carried the first 15 minute marker which is common on most Rolex models today. The 5508 had only the 15minute marker and are not known to have the bezel marker in 10 minute intervals like the 6536/1 (see picture below).


Both watches share a very similar dial. Both in original form are CR (Chapter ring) dials with swiss signed below. Naturally both are Gilt dials with the depth writing (100m) for both the 6536/1 and the 5508 in silver. The hands are 'mercedes' on both models and both in their original form are also glossy (black laquer dials). The movement on the 6536/1 is a calibre 1030. The 5508 came after the 6536/1 and thus carries the newer movement and successor movement to the 6536/1, calibre 1530 which was a more modern and reliable movement than the 1030. Both are so called 'Butterfly movements' because of the rotor which is shaped like a Butterfly on both the 6536/1 and the 5508 (see picture below). Movement of 6536/1 is on the right, 5508 is on the left.



The outer case back of both references are quite different. The 6536/1 is on the right and is quite different in shape than the smaller diameter case of the 5508 on the left (see picture below). The inner case back ofcourse is marked with the respective dates. On the left you have 5508 which has the smaller diameter also on the inside of the case back. It is also clearly marked with the date 1958. On the right you have the date marked III 1957 - third quarter 1957 of the 6536/1. See picture below.










    My conclusion: Both these early 'small crown' submariners without crown guards are charming. They are more wearable than their larger big crown brothers and are just as collectable. 

About the Rolex Oyster Perpetual Ref. 1030

The Rolex Oyster Perpetual reference 1030 represents an early iteration of the self-winding Oyster Perpetual line, a foundational model for the brand. This reference is distinguished by its automatic movement, housed within the robust Oyster case, which established the core principles of water resistance and automatic winding that became hallmarks of Rolex watches. It was part of the broader Oyster Perpetual family that emphasized reliability and everyday wearability.

This reference typically features a stainless steel Oyster case, housing the Rolex Caliber 1030, an automatic movement. The case diameter is commonly found around 34mm, a standard size for men's watches of its era. The watch is fitted with a domed acrylic crystal, contributing to its vintage aesthetic. The Caliber 1030 movement provides a power reserve suitable for daily use.

For collectors, the reference 1030 is significant as it showcases Rolex's commitment to developing durable and precise automatic timepieces. It appeals to those interested in the evolution of the Oyster Perpetual series and the early application of Rolex's self-winding technology. Variants exist with different dial configurations and hour markers, offering diversity within the reference.

Specifications

Caliber
1030
Case
Stainless Steel
Diameter
34mm
Dial
Silver
Water Resist.
50m
Crystal
Acrylic

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Sep 27, 2013
You are on a slippery slope. You should also consider the others...

Rolex 6204 / 6205, and Tudor 7922, which are truly magnificient no crownguard small crowns. And what about a Red 6536? The 6204 and 6205 came just before the 6536. While the Tudor came a bit later, but during the 6536 production. Having all of them would be a crazy but how magnificient theme, for a collection. Best, Nicolas

LE
Le Monde Edmond
Sep 27, 2013
slippery when wet

Nicolas, I like walking slippery slopes. Its more challenging and exciting. But as to your reasoning- I don't find I am walking any slippery slope! I was merely comparing two SC subs, nothing more, nothing less. Not implying that a 6536 is any less important. In fact a red depth 6536 is another league so wrong to compare with these two models. Its a much rarer beast ;) One I have not seen in a long time (please show me pictures of any you might have) ;)

LE
Le Monde Edmond
Oct 10, 2013
6204 or 6205

Nicolas- I have been given thought to your argument. I am very interested in the 6204 as it is considered the first submariner officially sold by Rolex. What is your opinion on this? A charming watch to own? Even the 6205 is very nice. Is it also on your radar? Best Edmond

AM
amanico
Oct 10, 2013
Historically and aesthetically very interesting, indeed!

DI
DivingT
Sep 27, 2013
Very nice post - great pictures...

..I'm bit of a fan of the 5508. Never had one, came very close late last year, but like an idiot, I dithered around to long :-( Until then, I'll just look at these types of posts!! cheers Tony

MI
Mike1066
Sep 27, 2013
Interesting Case Backs...

I never realized just how different the two casebacks are. And I really love that 6536 insert w/o thet 1-15 interval markers. Very clean look. Enjoy both of those great tool watches. V/R Mike

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →