
Amanico shares his appreciation for the Rolex Submariner Ref. 1680 Red, a vintage diver celebrated for its distinctive dial. His post highlights the subtle differences between two examples of this iconic reference, inviting collectors to delve into the nuances that make each piece unique. This discussion underscores the enduring appeal of vintage Rolex and the specific charm of the 'Red Sub'.
The Rolex Reference 1665, known as the "Great White," is a specific iteration within its model family. This particular reference is distinct from the Reference 1680, which the collector notes as a separate model undergoing a makeover.
This example features a case described as being in good condition. The movement is a caliber 1570. The dial is a servicedial with Luminova, marked as a Tritium dial.
This reference appeals to collectors seeking specific variations within the Rolex lineup. The presence of a servicedial with Luminova, marked as Tritium, is a notable characteristic for those interested in dial variations.
When I was gifted it, I was a bit skeptic... Then, I remembered I owned a Red Sub, and it came immediately evident that it was THE strap for it. Best, Luis. Nicolas
I like vintage patina but not so much when it is has aged a little too much though. Here, it is perfect to my taste. And I like this Nato choice which matches the red printings nicely. It is nice to see some watches very difficult to find in the wild, here on the forum. Thanks for sharing Nicolas. Cheers, Mark
grail watch for me I think it is impossible to find one in a so perfect condition ( and I have tried ! ) Love the patina ... The red Nato is perfect I dream to possess one day such a marvel Thanks Nicolas Best Christian
and thanks a lot for this wonderful offer As I said in another post my priority is to finance a jewel to celebrate the reunion with my wife Nevertheless around the end of next year, I sure will appreciate your help Cheers Christian
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →