24 replies2187 views1 photos
Jocke - Bad Santa's post captures a sentiment increasingly common among luxury watch enthusiasts: the frustration of extreme scarcity for certain brands. His experience waiting in line just to view, not touch, a Rolex highlights a significant shift in the market. This article synthesizes community reactions to explore the implications of this phenomenon, from historical context to the rising appeal of independent watchmakers.
When you have to wait several years to buy a watch, then you can stand in line for an hour to see but not touch.πππ
This is so crazy. So I feel good to focus on independent brands instead.
Key Points from the Discussion
- The current high demand for mechanical timepieces represents a sustained interest, unlike previous market fluctuations caused by economic crises such as the 1997 Asian crisis, the Dot Com implosion, and the 2008 financial fraud.
- While 'coveted' models from brands like Laurent Ferrier, H. Moser & Cie, Czapek, and Parmigiani Fleurier also face availability issues, brands like Tudor remain widely accessible.
- There were significant complaints about long lines and disorganization at the trade show, with many attendees missing appointments.
- The author notes the irony of Rolex branding the viewing experience as a 'guided tour' inside the 'Rolex House,' suggesting it's more about the perceived status of access than the watches themselves.
- It is more understandable to wait for a watch from an independent maker, but a serially produced watch should not require years of waiting or paying significantly over list price.
Advertisement
Continue the conversation
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
