Rolex Neo-Vintage GMT-Master vs. Submariner Comparison
Discussion

Rolex Neo-Vintage GMT-Master vs. Submariner Comparison

By descartes1 · Jan 23, 2021 · 21 replies
descartes1
WPS member · Rolex forum
21 replies2529 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

In a captivating "Neo-Vintage Battle" on WatchProSite, forum member descartes1 ignited a passionate debate comparing two iconic Rolex models: the GMT-Master and the Submariner. This article delves into the community's preferences, exploring the nuances that make each reference a coveted piece for collectors. descartes1's original post, featuring compelling imagery, serves as the perfect starting point for this horological showdown.

What’s your preference?



Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Jan 23, 2021

And for the Subs....

WA
Watcholic_id
Jan 24, 2021

but if I have to choose, then the GMT Master because of the slimmer case & dash of color

DE
descartes1
Jan 24, 2021

Plus, Rolex has done much more to promote the GMT line than the Sub with the first ceramic being a GMT (LN), the Batman, and of course Pepsi. The Sub has gotten far less attention. This has brought much greater attention to the neo-vintage GMTs than the Subs.

CH
Christian777
Jan 25, 2021

I’ve never got my head fully around regular use either a 24hr bezel or 12hr bezel as on my Oris. Practically speaking, the rotating 60 minutes bezel is something I use routinely when I cook or watch my kid’s sport.

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →