
Amanico presents a detailed look at the Rolex GMT-Master Ref. 16760, affectionately known as the 'Fat Lady.' He challenges the implications of its nickname, highlighting the watch's superb aesthetics, particularly its tropical dial, and discusses specific vintage collector details.
The Rolex GMT Master reference 16760 is a distinct offering within the GMT Master line. It features a sapphire crystal and tritium dial and hands. This reference is noted by collectors as a "neo vintage" model, bridging earlier and later designs.
This particular reference is equipped with a sapphire crystal. The dial and hands utilize tritium luminescence, which can develop a warm patina over time. No specific case materials or movement details are provided.
The 16760 appeals to collectors seeking a GMT Master with both a sapphire crystal and tritium components. It is considered by some to offer a blend of characteristics from different eras of the GMT Master production.
..you sometimes see this dial patina on some 16800, but I have never seen it on a saphire GMT. Thanks for sharing that special watch !
But on a Sapphire GMT, this is a first... And a superb first one! Best, Nicolas
Produced for a very short period and replaced by the 16700 and the 16710 basically less expensive/costly model 16700. The "non" date dial configuration appears with both the 16760 and 16750 in the very early glossy dials usually early 8 mil to early 9 mil. Non date is not the lack of date function/complication but the lack of the text "date" on the dial simply "Oyster Perpetual". The 16760 had the ability to set the hour hand independently and ratcheting bidirection bezel different to for exampl
And a glossy dial, the matte being issued for the very first years, while the glossy is more common. With the 16760, you have only glossy / circled indexes dial. Both of these 2 references are Worth being hunted, from a GMT Fan's perspective! Best, Bill. Nicolas
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 46 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →