Review
Bruno.M1's photo shoot of the Rolex Explorer II Ref. 216570 provides a compelling visual argument for this polarizing reference. His detailed images and personal commentary directly challenge common criticisms regarding its proportions, offering a fresh perspective that remains relevant for collectors evaluating modern Rolex designs. This post serves as an excellent resource for those considering the 42mm Explorer II, showcasing its aesthetic qualities through high-quality photography.
a friend of mine bought this watch.
borrowed it for one day to take these pics
Nicolas, reading your reply on a similar post a few steps below I have to say I completely disagree.
While you said;
Too large and too short hands, too big round indexes, too big and too thick case. The numbers on the bezel are too small, and too fat.
For me this is by far the most beautifull modern Rolex (when I say modern, I mean since they started with those fat lugs like the 116610 sub) This is again a nice watch. lugs are not too fat, the case is well proportioned, hands are fat but I like them. 'Small numbers on the bezel' ??? Where ?? I think they have the perfect size.
Like said, it's the watch from a friend but If I had to pick one Rolex today .... it would definitely be this one.
The new subs ? I don't like them and I was afraid every ne watch would look 'fat' this explorer is imo perfect. I prefer 42 above 40 mm. 42 Is not too big and like said, imo it still looksgreat on the wrist.
This message has been edited by DrStrong on 2011-10-27 23:31:12 This message has been edited by DrStrong on 2011-11-02 01:53:27The Rolex Submariner Date reference 116610LV represents a pivotal chapter in the Submariner s storied evolution, introduced in 2010 to commemorate the collection s 50th anniversary. This reference marked Rolex s bold departure from traditional aesthetics with its striking green dial and bezel combination, earning it the beloved nickname Hulk among collectors. Manufactured from 2010 to 2020, the 116610LV bridged the gap between Rolex s heritage diving watches and modern manufacturing excellence, incorporating the brand s revolutionary Cerachrom ceramic bezel technology while maintaining the fundamental DNA that made the Submariner an icon of tool watch design.
At the heart of the 116610LV beats the robust Caliber 3135, a time-tested automatic movement featuring 31 jewels and delivering a reliable 48-hour power reserve. This workhorse caliber incorporates Rolex s proprietary Parachrom blue paramagnetic hairspring, offering superior resistance to shocks and magnetic fields while maintaining chronometric precision. The movement s construction reflects decades of refinement, with a full balance bridge providing enhanced stability and the caliber s proven architecture ensuring long-term reliability. The sapphire crystal features anti-reflective coating for optimal legibility, while the case maintains the classic 40mm proportions that define the modern Submariner silhouette.
The 116610LV s most distinctive feature remains its monochromatic green colorway, executed through a sunburst green dial paired with a matching green Cerachrom ceramic bezel insert. This virtually scratchproof ceramic bezel represents a significant technical advancement over aluminum predecessors, offering fade resistance and enhanced durability. The Oystersteel case and bracelet showcase Rolex s mastery of 904L stainless steel, while the Glidelock clasp system allows for precise micro-adjustments without tools. Among collectors, the Hulk has achieved legendary status as one of the most recognizable and sought-after modern Submariner variants, representing the perfect synthesis of Rolex s innovative spirit and respect for horological tradition. Its discontinued status as of 2020 has only enhanced its desirability in the secondary market, cementing its position as a modern classic.
Wonderful watch! And beautiful photo... The only doubt is about the dial: white or black? I'm waiting for other photo... Thank you Bruno!
We are not obliged to agree on all, my friend. I stay on my position and thoughts on this watch: When you're used to the previous versions, ( the 1655 and the 16 550 / 570 ) there is a proportion, an harmony which had litteraly exploded, with this latest " opus ". Look at the bezel of the former models: The numbers were perfectly sized, while here, the bezel increased in size, while trhe numbers didn't and look a bit lost. Your admirable pics also show that there is no bevelled lugs, anymore. BU
this is what you see in the dark
Bruno you really captured and high-lighted the best aspect. Great pictorial. Thanks Bill
You managed to change the brute character of the watch and turn it into a much civilized presentation. Now I am more intrigued to see it in the flesh. What were your impressions in regards to comfort after having worn it all day? Best, Alex
I have to say your photo really change my mind on this watch. I'm sure I have no problem picking this watch and call it my 1st or 2nd modern Rolex. If I didn't knew the existence of the previous version. There are certain old world charm in those vintage pieces. A romantic side that speak to my heart. An era that bring back memories. The 70s, 80s even the early 90s not forgoting iconic time of 50s and 60s. Maybe I'm stuck in the past like some would say but is not a bad place to be. I'm hopeful
This thread is active on the Rolex forum with 28 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
