Rolex Deepsea vs. IWC Aquatimer vs. Panerai PAM 243
Review

Rolex Deepsea vs. IWC Aquatimer vs. Panerai PAM 243

By Miki · Jan 17, 2014 · 10 replies
Miki
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
10 replies4553 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Hi Guys, I am new here. Been a looker for sometime and decided its time to do some contribution and what better way to start my first post with some Heavy Weight Showdown... Got some free time, took some photos and decided to share it here. Always been a loyal fan of Panerai and never Rolex until th

10 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Hi Guys,

I am new here. Been a looker for sometime and decided its time to do some contribution and what better way to start my first post with some Heavy Weight Showdown...

Got some free time, took some photos and decided to share it here.

Always been a loyal fan of Panerai and never Rolex until they created The Deepsea. The IWC Aquatimer is just so iconic that its a must have for me. So here are my 3 deep divers up for a cage fight.



The contenders are , Rolex Deepsea - Iwc GST Aquatimer 3536 - Panerai Pam 243








1) Depth Rating
[linked image]

Rolex won hands down with the deepest rating of 3900m. Aquatimer 2000, as the name suggest, is half the depth of the Deepsea at 2000m, and Pam 243 is half of the Aquatimer at 1000m.

Actual testing-
Deepsea 4,875m.
Aquatimer 2000 3,200m.
243 ? I have not been able to get any info on this.






2) Size
[linked image]

243 is ahead by just a bit at 44mm, while Deepsea is at 43mm and Iwc is at 42mm. This measurement is without crown. With crown, there's no contesting who's the winner.

Case with crown-

243 approx 51mm
Deepsea approx 48mm
Aquatimer approx 45mm






3) Thickness/Crown
[linked image]

243 took this category with the thickest casing and biggest crown w/crown guard followed closely by Deepsea while Iwc is no match against the big boys with no crown guard and the thinness among the three. The 243 has the 1000m markings on the crown lever while the Deepsea has the famous Crown signature. The Aquatimer is the interesting one with the old fish logo, apparently used before Richemont took over Iwc.

Thickness-
243 18mm
Deepsea 17.68mm
Aquatimer 14mm






4) Dial
[linked image]

This is a pretty close contest between all three but purely my personal opinion, Aquatimer won this round. The ala military dial and minimalist look, compensate the lack of AR coating and lume on the second hand tip. Not talking about lume here, purely dial aesthetic in terms of legibility , wordings and date. It's madness, the amount of character on the Deepsea. Lol!

Number of words (characters) on the dials (including digits and symbols)

Aquatimer 47
243 50
Deepsea 141






5) Caseback
[linked image]

Rolex emerged the winner here. One of the three core component in the ring lock system to withstand immense pressure. The Aquatimer has a pretty decent case back with the Submarine logo and the 243 is the one with the most info engraved on its back.

Screw down case back

Deepsea Stainless Steel ring with titanium alloy
Aquatimer Titanium
243 Stainless Steel






6) Bezel
[linked image]

Aquatimer is the champion here with its unique bezel where you have to press down in order to rotate it. It's useful for divers as it practically eliminates the possibility of the bezel turning accidentally. The Deepsea have an impressive ceramic bezel insert, an upgrade in the recent changes from the older aluminum bezel found in Rolex earlier divers. 243 bezel have a nice contrast with its polished indicators against the brushed bezel.

Number of clicks

Deepsea 120 clicks
Aquatimer 60 clicks
243 60 clicks






7) Bracelet/Strap
[linked image]

This is a very very difficult category. All three divers have their strengths. Deepsea with its impressive glidelock bracelet. Aquatimer with its well engineered push pin system. Panerai with the unlimited ability to mount practically any straps. The winner? All three score a point. It's a tie.






8) Availability/Rarity
[linked image]

Both the Aquatimer and 243 are a discontinued model and Deepsea is widely available in the market. Tie between 243 and Aquatimer.

243 2500 pieces
Aquatimer 3000 pieces
Deepsea current production






9) Weight/Comfortability
[linked image]
[linked image]
[linked image]

No contest here when it comes to the weight. Deepsea is the real Heavy Weight champion! But since the arrival of the Aquatimer, the Champion is having a hard time to get on the wrist. The Aquatimer is so comfortable for daily wear. Since we are talking about weight and comfortability, Deepsea wins. The trick is to really fit the bracelet to your wrist size and wear it like how it's supposed to be worn! I bet the complains about the tapered bracelet and top heavy will soon be gone.





10) Conclusion

Depth Rating - Deepsea
Size - 243
Thickness/Crown - 243
Dial - Aquatimer
Caseback - Deepsea
Bezel - Aquatimer
Bracelet/Straps - Deepsea/Aquatimer/243
Availability/Rarity - 243/Aquatimer
Weight/Comfortability - Deepsea

Total
Deepsea 4 points
Aquatimer 4 points
243 4 points

It's a tie in total scored points between these three divers. I am lucky to own them and the only issue I have is deciding which one to wear. Lol.

This comparison is purely from my point of view and will varies with different owners.

Thanks for looking.

Cheers.

This message has been edited by Mirukina on 2014-01-17 12:27:57

About the Rolex Sea-Dweller 4000 Ref. 116600

The Sea-Dweller reference 116600 marked the return of the 40mm case size for the model, a dimension that had been absent from the Sea-Dweller lineup for some time. This reference reintroduced several classic Sea-Dweller design elements, distinguishing it from its larger contemporary, the Sea-Dweller 4000. It was produced for a relatively short period, making it a notable transitional model within the brand's professional tool watch offerings.

This reference features a stainless steel case measuring 40mm in diameter and 15.3mm in thickness. It is equipped with a unidirectional rotating bezel made of black ceramic with a 60-minute graduation. The watch is powered by the automatic caliber 3135, offering a power reserve of approximately 48 hours. A sapphire crystal protects the black dial, which includes a date complication without the cyclops lens, a characteristic feature of the Sea-Dweller line.

Appealing to collectors who appreciate traditional proportions and the technical capabilities of a professional dive watch, the 116600 is recognized for its blend of heritage design and modern materials. Its limited production run contributes to its appeal among enthusiasts seeking a Sea-Dweller with a more classic case size and specific aesthetic details, such as the matte-like black dial and the absence of the cyclops over the date.

Specifications

Caliber
3135
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
40 mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
1220m
Crystal
Sapphire crystal
Advertisement
The Discussion
FO
foversta
Jan 17, 2014
Congrats for this great first post!

So welcome on Board! And thanks for this great post, it is the perfect way to join the community! Fx

AM
amanico
Jan 17, 2014
That is a very nice first post, Mirukina.

We love these comparison posts a lot, here. Welcome here, by the way. Looking forward to reading more from you, Best. Nicolas

BI
Bill
Jan 17, 2014
You know how to make an entrance...

Great and thoughtful evaluation of three great candidate dive watches. You must have come in with a favorite so tell all.... Thanks and welcome to the forum. Bill

SE
secretlife
Jan 17, 2014
Interesting take-away

Thanks for posting your comparison. I had never really thought about it but I find it interesting to note that the biggest and thickest case with the largest and most elaborate crown corresponds with the poorest depth rating; not that it matters of course! (",)

HS
hs111
Jan 17, 2014
Truly nice and interesting post.. Congrats to your Trio.. And: Welcome here ! (nt)

TO
TOPLIMIT
Jan 18, 2014
Thanks for the post!

I am always a fan of this variant of the Aquatimer; the newer ones are just not as well designed in my opinion. And since I am biased, I would pick the Aquatimer over the other two as well! Teehee :P

Available on the marketplace

19,546 Rolex listings are live on the eBay market and 1886 collector listings on the WatchProSite marketplace.

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 10 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →