Richard Mille SIHH Coverage & Counterfeit Debate
Discussion

Richard Mille SIHH Coverage & Counterfeit Debate

By 219 · Apr 24, 2014 · 16 replies
219
WPS member · Richard Mille forum
16 replies15211 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

here is a very public demonstration of why it is necessary to lock down people wandering around with high resolution cameras who may, or may not, be part of recognized media. It looks like a real one on the arm of a distinguished and high ranking Indonesian general..... But no! Read on! He publicly

16 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
here is a very public demonstration of why it is necessary to lock down people wandering around with high resolution cameras who may, or may not, be part of recognized media.

It looks like a real one on the arm of a distinguished and high ranking Indonesian general.....

Wearing what he said to be a Chinese-made watch, Indonesian Armed Forces Chief Gen. Moeldoko speaks to the media during a press conference in Jakarta, Indonesia, Wednesday, April 23, 2014. Under fire in the media after being photographed with the luxury watch on his wrist, Indonesia's military commander says his critics should move on, explaining the timepiece is a cheap Chinese fake. (AP Photo)

But no!  Read on!  He publicly declares it a Chinese fake and slams it on the table....

https://sg.news.yahoo.com/indonesian-general-says-flashy-watch-fake-141153179.html

Richard is guarding his intellectual  property rights, plus the brand image to each and every Richard Mille watch owner.

It is such a shame that the world is the way it is!

Andrew H

PS.  With thanks to the friend who brought this to my attention.

Advertisement
The Discussion
RA
RahulR
Apr 24, 2014
Personally I don't buy it...

I more or less live in Indonesia, and have spent 20 years here. Military generals are extremely powerful and influential (and many are extremely wealthy people) in this country. Quite a few have successful businesses and have personal networths in the hundreds of millions. Don't want to get into the details, but it is what it is i suppose. If it was my guess, the watch is very real. It makes more sense to destroy a US$100k+ watch than risk being investigated and have millions of dollars exposed

MI
milenium
Apr 24, 2014
Or who's to say he doesn't have both...

Maybe he had someone find him a fake just for the publicity stunt of throwing it on the table.....or like you said, maybe he didn't care and threw his real one on the table as well.

PA
patrick_y
Apr 24, 2014
+1 to the stunt watch... [nt]

SE
secretlife
Apr 24, 2014
My money is on it being genuine... [nt]

DO
doubleup
Apr 24, 2014
That is crazy, what a shame.

I still don't by the restraint of high res pics, once one is sold it can get out there, someone can see it on someone's wrist and take a pic, I absolutely don't agree with not letting people take pics or showing your watches. fakes are here to stay people, as bad as that is. and they don't make them exactly like the real watches, too expensive.. Anyway, that story is crazy, I kind of hope it was a fake that was destroyed..... Crazy story

KE
kevster
Apr 24, 2014
So...

Is he being pursued for having purchased the "fake"?

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Richard Mille forum with 16 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →