
This post from PuristSPro announces the rollout of a new user interface, marking a significant evolution in the platform's design and functionality. It invites community feedback, highlighting the team's commitment to adapting to new technologies and user expectations. The discussion that follows provides a valuable historical record of user sentiment and technical challenges during a critical transition period for the forum.



us rigid non adjustable oldtimers to somehow keep some of old page styles somewhere? Cordially D
We cannot afford the resources to maintain 5 different versions of the website that we used to have. Now with Google driving the WWW to be accessible to mobile devices, tablets and olde worlde personal computers AT the same time, we need one landing pad. I am a PC dinosaur with 4 Windows-based laptops and 3 Windows-based desktops. I use them all...even a Win-98 desktop solely for old games of the DOS and early Pentium era. :-) But, still I have to evolve... Regards, MTF
one old version :) Pretty please :) Well I for one should know that is adapt or die world out there for last few billion years.....still I'm one sad dinosaur Yours D
in a thread. It then moves to the 'beginning' of the page you are on, and that makes it a bit messy and confusing imo. Personally i'd rather have the reply to open (unfold) in the original chronologic position of the thread. Other than that: really like the new design. Its fresh and much better suited for handhelds.
We did build in some strong visual ques to show what is new. I hope you will give the new interface a chance to flourish. Bill
One thing I personally miss in the new design - which certainly looks nicely fresh - is the 'Front Page' tab, where all the posts from the main subforums get shown in the chronological order - makes it easy to see at a glance what is new IMHO. Any chance of that feature making it back in in one of the future edits?
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 81 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →