Patek Philippe Cubitus Quartz Model Leak Analysis
Discussion

Patek Philippe Cubitus Quartz Model Leak Analysis

By chmandaue · Oct 16, 2024 · 35 replies
chmandaue
WPS member · Patek Philippe forum
35 replies10643 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

In a speculative dive into Patek Philippe's potential future, chmandaue meticulously dissects a leaked watch model, proposing a compelling argument for its quartz movement. His detailed analysis, complete with an annotated diagram, challenges conventional expectations and explores how a complex perpetual calendar could function within a quartz framework. This thought experiment offers valuable insights into the design considerations and technical possibilities that could shape luxury watchmaking.

35 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →


Watch by Patek Philippe, Rolex, Cubitus


Before you dismiss the possibility out of hand, consider:

1) The dial lost the power reserve

2) There is a big date, day and moonphase. As a mechanical, all three would need to be corrected upon watch reset.

3) The small seconds has only twelve tick marks, not the 5 7 1 2's sixty tick marks. (Significance explained below.)


As a quartz watch, this is the dial of a big date perpetual calendar moonphase watch. The annotated photo explains how it all works.

Inside, there are 3 motors:
1) main motor for the minutes and hours
2) second motor for the small seconds
3) third motor for the big date

When setting the perpetual calendar in the outermost crown position, you first set the date. Then you push the crown in, pull out again quickly, and see the seconds hand jump to one of the 12 hash marks, You set the month. Another push/pull and the seconds points to one of 4 cardinal directions, Set the year of the leap year cycle. This is method patented by Rolex in 1987, and is now in the public domain.

Well, maybe I am wrong the above is another mechanical. But does it make sense to have day of the week, which is yet another thing to correct?

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
CH
Chewbacca
Oct 16, 2024
A 30K-40K Quartz? They are having a laugh with this.

Surely that cant be right?

CH
chmandaue
Oct 16, 2024
Why not?

FP Journe’s Elegante is 40K on secondary market, with no date

EN
enjoythemusic
Oct 16, 2024
You Are Quoting Bubble-Economics. Honsty.... $40,000 for a FPJ Quartz is laughable imho. The BUBBLE POPPED FOLKS! It's GAME OVER. <<<

Now we enter the financial phase when timepiece manufacturers will have to get back to working to make a sale as was the historic norm. In fact, we may go back to the Asia crisis times or worse financially. Be prepared folks. Just ask LVMH stock / recent report. Let us all take a moment, a breath as it were, and know that for $40,000 you can get some very impressive mechanical timepieces (or two timepieces). But to be fair to PP, it is probably more profitable going quartz and servicing should b

PA
patrick_y
Oct 17, 2024
Hmm. Actually, I can see that as a possibility.

Imagine if it's a PLATINUM cased watch, quartz, complicated, and from Patek Philippe. I can see that costing $40K easily on a strap. A steel, no complications, Patek Philippe, on a strap would already cost close to $20K. Data point is the Patek 24 for ladies is already $16K USD. A men's model would cost more and wouldn't have the diamonds.

CH
chmandaue
Oct 18, 2024
Well it didn’t happen

Perpetual calendar instructions could have been: 1) you don’t need to reset it 2) take to AD every 4 years 3) consider to buy another watch from AD, while AD changes battery and seals

PA
patrick_y
Oct 18, 2024
Still. I REALLY LIKED YOUR POST!

It was a nice technical post. And you covered the User Interface topic thoroughly. Even though it wasn't a quartz watch this time, I think you took a risk to show your thoughts! And I'm glad that you took a thoughtful risk! I was getting excited about getting a quartz watch too.

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 35 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →