Patek Philippe: Enduring Value & Collectibility

biw · 2021-12-26T16:30:01Z

Explore the debate on a Patek Philippe Calatrava Cross tattoo. Is brand loyalty forever? Collectors discuss permanence, personal meaning, and potential regrets.

In a thought-provoking post, biw explores the deeply personal decision of getting a tattoo, drawing a parallel between the permanence of body art and the enduring legacy of a Patek Philippe timepiece. He contemplates the significance of a discreet Calatrava Cross tattoo, questioning whether such a symbol truly embodies a lifelong commitment. This discussion delves into the intricate relationship between personal identity, brand allegiance, and the concept of 'forever' in both horology and self-expression.

I always wondered about getting a tattoo. Is there anything I would want on my body forever (my lifetime)?

This was one idea I am considering. The watch is real, the tattoo is fake, BTW.

Hidden, personal, not controversial, small - prefer even smaller than this example.

Something only enthusiasts would understand. What I would want with a tattoo.

I'll play around with this idea before doing something permanent. Perhaps this is all I need to get it out of my system?

A tattoo is like a Patek, you will keep it forever - however you cannot pass it on to the next generation,

Key Points from the Discussion

Many contributors express strong reservations about brand-specific tattoos, citing concerns about corporate allegiance and potential changes in a company's direction or personal taste over time.
A key argument against a Patek Philippe tattoo is the risk of future regret if the brand's image or the owner's personal connection to it changes, or if unforeseen personal tragedies occur.
One member shares a 'compromise' solution: a subtle, unbranded anniversary bracelet that serves as a constant, personal accessory without the permanence of a tattoo.
The Calatrava Cross, while iconic in watch collecting, carries potential for misinterpretation in certain social contexts, with one user noting its resemblance to symbols associated with white power supremacy.
The original author reflects on the discussion, confirming that the concerns raised reinforce his long-held hesitations about permanent tattoos, and he will stick with temporary options.
An anecdote recalls a Paneristi who got a Panerai logo tattoo, but the meaning was deeply personal, representing friendships and support during difficult times, rather than just brand loyalty.

The Discussion

amanico

Dec 26, 2021

:))) A hard core fan idea.

Blansky

Dec 26, 2021

It's a cool logo....lots of people would ask what the tattoo meaning was.....most wouldn't know....

I wouldn't do your placement (it that's what you mean), but if I was so inclined to have that tattoo I'd do it in a different area.

Tegis

Dec 26, 2021

Get it on your lower back a.k.a. a tramp stamp ;)

Maybee add a little "Tiffany & Co" as welll?

socal to az

Dec 26, 2021

I would not do this

I love Patek. Adore them as a company. But at the end of the day, I hold no allegiance to Patek or any other manufacturer. Today all might be rosy and great. Tomorrow they decide to sell and change their business practice and start making pieces you don’t like or have a corporate vision you don’t share. For sure I’m not going to brand myself and beholden to any corporate brand. I live breathe and sleep Patek. But not enough to get a tattoo.

holdemchamp1225

Dec 26, 2021

Now that is dedication 😳👍

GLau

Dec 26, 2021

Wow 😳 Is that a

real tattoo ? If yes, you earned my respect as the Patek moderator! I am NOT worthy 🥲

Patek Philippe: Enduring Value & Collectibility

Key Points from the Discussion

Continue the conversation