Patek Philippe 5960/01G-001 Collection Consolidation
Collection

Patek Philippe 5960/01G-001 Collection Consolidation

By W=N+1 · Sep 8, 2018 · 16 replies
W=N+1
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
16 replies6835 views11 photos
f š• in šŸ’¬ āœ‰ šŸ”—

W=N+1's reflective post delves into the perennial collector's dilemma: the pursuit of a focused collection versus the allure of expansion. Starting from an initial Omega acquisition, the author chronicles a journey through various brands, ultimately leading to a significant consolidation into a Patek Philippe 5960/01G-001. This piece offers valuable insights into the motivations behind collection refinement and the challenges of maintaining a curated selection.

16 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
Dear all, 

A few years ago, I caught the bug.  When I was at school my mate’s Dad had a TAG and it was the coolest watch I’d ever seen.  I told myself that I’d get one some day.  

Fast forward a few years and I was in a position to go ā€˜proper’ watch shopping.  So, I visited a local jewellers that housed a TAG Boutique to fulfil my childhood ambition... and I left with an Omega Planet Ocean Chronograph (they also had an Omega boutique) that was double the budget I had set myself!

That was just over 6 years ago.  Since then, I built up a bit of a collection, which included: TAGs (Monaco 24, Steel Grand Carrera, Calibre 1 Manual Wind and Calibre 5 ā€˜Drive Timer’), Omegas (Planet Ocean Chrono, Dark Side, Grey Side, Bond Aqua Terra, Good Planet GMT, a Green/Gold Moonphase, a LE Apollo 17 and a blue CK2998); and a Limited Edition Breitling Navitimer.  I’d never really been in Rolex up until this point, but one day I saw the Yacht-Master 40 and eventually ended up getting the blue dial version.  And, I was happy.  

I thought I was happy.  

Then I met a man who I’ll refer to as ā€œMichaelā€ (that's his name).  Michael has a Patek Philippe.  We got talking.  I’d always been aware of Patek, but I hadn’t ever seen one that I really like the look of - I was younger then and the watches I’d seen in the boutiques just did not appeal to me (which was lucky, because neither did the price tags!) - too small and delicate.  However, I couldn’t help but start looking some, watching on-line review videos, etc.  Oh, Michael also has an A. Lange & Sohne.  (Yes, he’s a very bad influence!)

So, after much research and late-night YouTube video binge-watching sessions I decided to sell (almost) all of my watches and consolidate them in to one Patek Philippe.  I went for the 5960/01G-001.



And, I thought I was happy.  And, I am happy - it’s a lovely watch!  In fact, since I’ve had it I’ve not worn any of my other three watches that survived ā€˜the upgrade’.







I’ve heard of people talking about a 'one-watch’ collection, or more reasonably, a ā€˜five-watch’ collection, but I guess the eternal question is: which watches?!  

I think I’m in danger or re-establishing a collection.  Which, I genuinely want to avoid doing!  After all, the last time that happened most of them didn’t get any wrist-time and simply sat in their boxes for months, except when I got them out to look at them!  Also, when it came time to sell them, I lost money.  However, in spite of this, a month or so ago, I was trying to decide what watches would be in my five-piece collection.

Somewhere along the line, I decided that I need a Panerai.  Two contenders emerged after 6* hours of trying on every piece in the AD: PAM01392 and the PAM01535. (*=a conservative estimate)





After never really being that ā€˜fussed’ with Rolex when I started buying watches, after my Yacht-Master, I realised I did like a few of the catalogue... specifically, like the new DateJust 41 and the steel SkyDweller:




As I mentioned, my ā€œfriend’sā€ influence introduced my to A. Lange & Sohne.  Apparently, I’m meant to get a Datograph, but after visiting the AD in Leeds I’ve decided that my top two are both from their Saxonia family: the Moonphase and the Annual Calendar:







So, if I was going for a five-watch collection to end my collecting days... which combination of the above would you go for (and why)?  The 5960 is a keeper, but I’d consider selling/replacing the other three.

Lastly... after saying countless times ā€œI’m just not that into white/light coloured dialsā€ I was scrolling through the Patek catalogue online when I saw the 5320G-001... It looks amazing!!

What do you think of a Patek-only two-watch collection?  5960 and 5320...?!



Thanks in advance!  I’m really looking forward to reading your responses, views and opinions!

Daniel


About the Omega Nautilus Ref. CK2998

The Omega Nautilus reference CK2998 is a specific model within the Omega lineup. This reference is identified by its unique alphanumeric designation.

No verifiable details regarding the case, materials, crystal, or movement are provided in the input facts or the collector's post.

This reference appeals to collectors interested in specific Omega models identified by their reference numbers. Its position within the broader Omega collection is defined by its individual reference.

Specifications

Caliber
321
Case
Stainless steel
Diameter
39-40mm
Dial
Black
Water Resist.
30m
Crystal
Hesalite

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Sep 8, 2018
Welcome here and thanks for such a first post!

Less is more is a motto we are fond of, here. A small but well thought collection is something a lot of people is thinking of. I suggest you take more time, scrolling our pages, the catalogs or web sites of the brands you are considering and you will probably make great choices. As for Panerai, I would rather go for a more " roots " one such as the Pam 372. As for Rolex, yes, the Sky Dweller is a good one, but I would suggest you try it, just to be sure. As for Patek, the 5320 certainly is a goo

W=
W=N+1
Sep 8, 2018
Future-proofing.

Hi Amanico, thanks for your comments. All the watches (or variations of), except the 5320, have been on my wrist at some point. I’ve always bought to keep and not flip or sell for profit, but one’s tastes change over time - which happened to most of my previous collection (especially the TAGs!) I like smaller (not small) size watches now and I’m not sure that ā€˜trends’ in changing tastes reverse? I can’t imagine wanting to wear a 45.5mm PO Chrono again - similarly with Panerai - I’m not a fan of

AM
amanico
Sep 8, 2018
So avoid Panerai. The interesting Panerai watches are somewhere between 44 and 47 mm. 47 mm even better. [nt]

W=
W=N+1
Sep 8, 2018
Good point, well made...

I know it’s a ā€œPanerai thingā€, to be big, but... I can’t help but like 1392 and 1535!

AM
amanico
Sep 8, 2018
You'd better like them, because if you want to sell them, it won't be that easy. [nt]

PA
Passionata_george
Sep 8, 2018
every man needs a Rolex

but seriously the 5960 is great but it isn t fine in water I d definetly keep that YM blue which is a very versatile piece imho if you want some upgrade replace it w the SkyD t but a proper WR watch is important in any good collection The rest of your questions are based on personal preferences , I think a 5pieces collection is decent at least my final plan having not more than that in active rotation .My collection based on manufacturers omega,Rolex and PP and a mix of complications and so far

Available on the marketplace

Omega CK 2998 Speedmaster SS Black Dial
29,500 USD
Pre-owned - Excellent · US
View all Omega on the marketplace →Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch 39.7mm CK2998 Men’s Chronograph Limite
11,890 USD
Pre-owned - Good · JP
Omega Speedmaster CK2998 LE Steel Watch 311.32.40.30.02.001 Card
10,120 USD
Pre-owned - Good · US
Omega Speedmaster CK2998 SS Silver Panda Dial
9,500 USD
Pre-owned - Good · US

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 16 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →