
Redcorals ignites a fascinating debate with his post showcasing a customized Patek Philippe Nautilus Ref. 5711 by Artisans de Genève. This piece challenges the community to consider the boundaries of luxury watch modification and whether an iconic reference benefits from bespoke alterations. His images prompt a critical discussion on aesthetics, value, and the very essence of an horological legend.


But the honest truth is, an icon/legend needs no reintroduction or modification. Any alteration would have to come from the company (PP) itself to make sense.
I feel the 5711 is just another watch, its not really rare or anything truly special. I personally know over 20 people who have had or currently own this watch. If the owner of it wants to spice it up, than more power to them. The real question is why? Would the outcome be better than a Logical 1, an AP Double Balancier, etc. etc. My short answer to my own question is “no”. It looks fine, it is making headlines, the guy who commissioned this probably has 3x 5711/1As anyway and did this just to k
No message body
But not of this project, to put it plainly. H.
But with this one, “a solution in search of a problem” comes to mind.
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 35 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →