Collection
In a compelling post, taimur97 seeks the WatchProSite community's expertise to navigate the challenging acquisition of his first Patek Philippe in Pakistan. His detailed analysis of three distinct referencesâthe 5015J, 5396R, and 5235Râhighlights the significant personal and financial considerations involved. taimur97's dilemma, balancing unique aesthetics with long-term wearability and collector appeal, resonates with enthusiasts worldwide facing similar high-stakes decisions.
Patek Philippe Reference 5396
The Reference 5396 represents Patek Philippe's annual calendar offering within the Annual Calendar with Moon Phase series. This 38.5mm reference provides the annual calendar complication combined with moon phase indication, positioning it as a complex calendar watch that requires manual correction only once per year in February.
The watch features an 18k white gold case measuring 38.5mm in diameter with a smooth bezel and sapphire crystal. The automatic Caliber 324 S IRM QA LU provides 45 hours of power reserve. Water resistance is rated to 30 meters, and the watch is fitted with a leather strap.
In production since 2006, the Reference 5396 appeals to collectors seeking Patek Philippe's annual calendar complication in white gold. The 38.5mm case size offers contemporary wearability while the moon phase adds visual interest to the calendar display. This reference serves collectors prioritizing complicated timepieces with practical daily calendar functions.
5396 would be my choice but it is the only one from your list that I have tried so I am biased!
Welcome to WPS. And this is one of your first posts! I normally give my customary "you have to choose yourself without the influence of strangers" statement (some of the old guard on WPS say I sound like broken record, forever repeating the same message) - but those posters are often haven't demonstrated a lot of thought themselves and just post a one-line message asking "what should I choose?" You've clearly articulated much more than they have and mentioned some of your thoughts and values. Oh
First, two reasons would have me set aside the ref. 5396. The first is purely subjective, the second a little less: I personally don't like sector dials, so the aesthetic of this timepiece isn't for me. More importantly, the 4Hz central rotor caliber (324 S QA LU) is way less attractive and technically interesting, imho, than the 3Hz micro-rotor 240 PS IRM C LU (of ref. 5015) and the very original 3.2Hz micro-rotor 31-260 REG QA (for ref. 5235). Then, between the two ref. 5015 and 5235, I would
I would definitely go for the 5396 of the 3 as itâs more of a perfect daily. I do love the 5235 especially in white gold but it is not the easiest watch to live with and wear as a daily. The 5396 is a lovely daily wear annual calendar, has the layout similar to the 3448 (one of the greatest patek of all time - sorry cubitus) and there is something special about the sector dial calatrava for me. It is also discontinued and getting harder to find full sets in nice condition. I would say it is well
- 5015: I am in love with this watch, size, originality, there is everything to love there. It is true, it has a very 90's look - 5396: Lovely watch, even though I tend to think that the looks will go out of fashion quicker than expected, in comparison the 5015 is an all time classic - 5235: I was reluctant to try it on, but it was a great surprise, super watch, very good looking and very out "of the comfort zone" of Patek. The main drawback I see is the "Regulateur" display which might necessit
But I donât think 5235 or 5015 are my first (and only) Patek. 5396 (IMHO) has the most classic and timeless design. And would probably be my choice. I would also look at a 5205 and 5396r non-sector.
This thread is active on the Patek Philippe forum with 45 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
