
ArmisT, a seasoned Omega collector, grapples with the allure of new Speedmaster releases, specifically the white dial, FOIS, and reverse panda. His original post delves into the collector's dilemma: how to integrate new pieces without redundant acquisitions or sacrificing existing favorites like his ST1. This article explores ArmisT's internal debate and the community's perspective on expanding a Speedmaster collection.


The Speedmaster Professional stands as Omega's most enduring achievement, tracing its lineage to 1957 when it emerged as part of the brand's professional trilogy alongside the Seamaster 300 and Railmaster. This particular reference represents the contemporary iteration of the legendary 'Moonwatch,' maintaining the essential DNA that earned NASA qualification for all manned space missions since 1965. The model's connection to lunar exploration remains unmatched in horological history, with this same basic design accompanying every Apollo mission.
The watch employs Omega's hand-wound caliber 1863, derived from the historic Lemania 861 movement that powered the original moon-landing watches. The asymmetrical case construction features twisted lugs and crown guards designed to protect the chronograph pushers during extravehicular activity. The tachymeter bezel, calibrated to 500 units per hour, and the tri-compax subdial layout at 3, 6, and 9 o'clock represent one of chronograph design's most copied configurations. The hesalite crystal maintains historical accuracy over modern sapphire alternatives in the standard Professional model.
Market positioning reflects the Speedmaster's unique status as both accessible luxury and significant horological artifact. Unlike many contemporary chronographs that pursue complications or materials innovation, the Professional model deliberately preserves its 1960s specifications. This conservative approach has sustained consistent collector demand across generations, with the reference serving as both entry point into serious watch collecting and endpoint for enthusiasts seeking authentic space heritage. The model's production consistency makes it among the most liquid luxury chronographs in the secondary market.
No need to add the new one in my opinion. Too similar 😁. It looks excellent on that strap. PS. I’m in love with the new moonshine gold version though.
Otherwise, to your point, these two steel versions are close enough such that the new one wouldn’t provide a significant difference in experience. Thank you 🙏🏽
When I think straight, I know I am mostly reacting to something new and shiny😊. So, this is where you all bring me back to my senses.
Indeed, I was looking on Omega site for the strap version of the new one to see how it looks…but it’s only offered on bracelet, which is maybe better suited to the lacquer dial.
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →