Omega Seamaster 300 166.024 Authentication Guide
Vintage

Omega Seamaster 300 166.024 Authentication Guide

By EdwardL · Mar 8, 2011 · 21 replies
EdwardL
WPS member · Omega forum
21 replies2228 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

EdwardL shares a crucial learning experience in vintage watch acquisition, emphasizing the importance of careful research to avoid common pitfalls like redials and incorrect components. His post serves as a valuable guide for collectors navigating the complexities of authenticating vintage Omega Seamaster 300s, particularly the reference 166.024.

21 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →

After the recent slip up with the 2 redial Omega Military I have been very CAREFUL.

And here again I want to share with you all a learning experience.

After being less impulsive and with a little home work I was able to acquire my first Diver.

Here are the Pics.

  


Wait at minute. I wasn't talking about the above watch. It is a borrowed picture of a notorious watch for reference.

Stubbies, loops of 6 And 9 are closed, bezel inserts wrong. No white square line around the date window.

 

 

The actual watch I am talking about is this.
























The letter A in waterproof is a flat top. certified spelled correctly.


 





Correct case ref: 166.024 is correct.

 

 




Movement is cal 565.

And of course a traditional wristshots.



 








Thanking for bearing your patience.

 

Greetings.

 

Ed

This message has been edited by Edward Lee on 2011-03-08 08:48:06 This message has been edited by Edward Lee on 2011-03-08 08:50:41

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
AM
amanico
Mar 8, 2011
Aah, you caught me for 2 or 3 seconds.

I was afraid for a short moment that you got the first one. Well done. I miss, really miss my 2 Seamasters... Best, Nicolas. This message has been edited by amanico on 2011-03-08 10:45:31

ED
EdwardL
Mar 8, 2011
He!he! Nico, that was my intention...

To deceive(not exactly, just tease) those who know. But help those who don't. Thank you for your nice words. You miss your 2 SM. Have you sold them? Or you haven't given them wrist-time? As for mine, it does not look as bad on my small wrist in flesh. Cheers Ed Ps: the other chunkier buckle that I saved has been assigned to this watch. Couldn't put it on this Nato due to a fixed buckle already on it. This message has been edited by Edward Lee on 2011-03-08 18:00:20 This message has been edited b

AM
amanico
Mar 8, 2011
No, Ed ...

Sadly my 2 SM are gone with the burglars... And I will have big issues to find these 2 pieces again, as they were in great condition, with an outstanding patina. Best, Nicolas.

ED
EdwardL
Mar 9, 2011
Sorry about that Nico..

May those perpetrators be cursed and damned. And for you I wish you luck that some day you will find what you lost. Ed

BI
Bill Sohne
Mar 8, 2011
Nice example Edward... but...

Hi Edward Nice example , but the crown is incorrect. It should have a bullet nosed screwdown crown .... not a major issue but one I would correct at your next service. The black gunk on the winding wheels appears to be old o-ring material that decomposed over time.... Good Hunting Bill Sohne

ED
EdwardL
Mar 8, 2011
Thank you for your comments...

Hi Bill, Thanks for your evaluation. I have replaced the faulty setting lever, setting bridge and the arbor I had my doubts about the button. Thanks again. Cheers Ed

Available on the marketplace

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Omega forum with 21 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →