Omega 157.001 vs. 168.025 Constellation Comparison
Vintage

Omega 157.001 vs. 168.025 Constellation Comparison

By JFT · Dec 5, 2019 · 23 replies
JFT
WPS member · Omega forum
23 replies4049 views15 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

JFT seeks community input on a difficult choice between two vintage Omega watches: a solid 18k gold Ref. 157.001 and a Ref. 168.025 Constellation with a unique two-tone pie-pan dial. His post highlights the nuances collectors consider when evaluating vintage pieces, from case material to dial rarity and condition.

Which one is better/you'd rather pick up? *all of them are the seller pictures*



Ref 157.001 in solid 18k gold, around 1300 usd















Or ref 168.025 pie pan dual tone dial for 300 bucks more?

















Thank you!

Best
JFT

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
RE
Reuven Malter
Dec 5, 2019

2nd: love the unusual dial colour-combination 1st: very nice guilloche on an otherwise boring piece. I would check them in the metal: if the guilloche is truly anazing, i would take the first. In any other case i would take the second watch...

HA
halgedahl
Dec 5, 2019

and therefore, desirable. Not a bad conundrum. Take your time. And best of luck with your choice! FH

FI
Figij005
Dec 5, 2019

Interesting dial, pristine condition and an ultraslim automatic movement not seen everyday.

JF
JFT
Dec 5, 2019

Well.... The indices were painted black, unlike the onyx inserts which previously used on constellation prior to this one, so most are taken its toll from its age on this series...

JF
JFT
Dec 5, 2019

And yeah, I never seen this combo, mostly was black in center and gold in its periphery. Kinda want this but solid gold watch was quite a bargain for a solid gold watch 😵

JF
JFT
Dec 5, 2019

Thanks for the input! And yeah, it's the thinnest omega automatic ever

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Omega forum with 23 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →