39 replies9858 views2 photos
Nicolas (amanico) presents a captivating Omega reference 2366, lamenting a redone dial despite its otherwise stunning condition and exceptional movement. This post sparked a fascinating discussion among collectors, delving into the authenticity and rarity of specific dial variants for this reference. The community's collective expertise sheds light on the nuances of vintage Omega dials, offering valuable insights for enthusiasts and collectors alike.
If only this dial was not redone... Even if very well redone...
It would have been mine. This movement is to die for.
Best,
Nicolas
Key Points from the Discussion
- The dial in question is likely a legitimate, albeit rare, variant of an Omega 2364 dial, not a prototype or a redone piece as initially suspected. It shares characteristics with other documented dials for the 31.6mm Ref. 2366.
- Initially, the dial was considered a prototype due to its unique configuration, specifically the absence of markers between 5 and 7. However, after seeing an identical example, it's now believed to be an extremely rare, authentic dial variant.
- Another example of the same dial configuration, exhibiting significant patina, was shared, which helped reassure the original poster about the authenticity of the design.
- The unique dial configuration, particularly the vacated minute track and punched markers, was initially unfamiliar to some experts, suggesting its rarity among Omega chronometers from the late 1940s.
- The discussion highlights the importance of the minute track and its potential compromise in modern, quartz timepieces, contrasting with the intricate adjustments required for vintage mechanical watches.
Advertisement
Continue the conversation
This thread is active on the Omega forum with 39 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →
