The New Holy Trinity of Watches Discussion
Discussion

The New Holy Trinity of Watches Discussion

By enjoythemusic · Dec 28, 2021 · 28 replies
enjoythemusic
WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
28 replies5132 views1 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

In a thought-provoking discussion, enjoythemusic challenges the long-held notion of the 'Holy Trinity' in horology, arguing that the landscape of mechanical timepieces has dramatically shifted. He invites the WatchProSite community to redefine this esteemed group, focusing specifically on true independent manufacturers. This article synthesizes the community's diverse perspectives on which brands deserve a place in a modern horological pantheon.

Have been thinking about the old-school "Holy Trinity" some entity came up with long ago. A few of the older brands have been bought and sold to big conglomerates. One changed leadership with some questions coming forward during that time. Thus the old-school Holy Trinity desperately needs updating imho. 

Since the mechanical timepiece landscape has GREATLY changed since the first-generation old-school Holy Trinity was decided upon by ????, we are now faced with the important task here on WPS of what manufacturers should be part of the new modern Holy Trinity. 

Which handcrafted true independent timepiece manufacturers should be part of the new Holy Trinity of timepieces?





Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
RI
rip9er
Dec 28, 2021

That said I don’t think we need to replace the original trinity but maybe it can be rephrased modern independents trinity?

WA
Watchonthewrist
Dec 28, 2021

Debethune , Urwerk and MBandF

EN
enjoythemusic
Dec 28, 2021

So we keep the Old-School Trinity, yet have a new Modern Holy Trinity for independents.

MI
MikiJ
Dec 28, 2021

Audemars Piguet, Vacheron Constantin and Patek Philippe. Independents aside, maybe we should add A Lange & Sohne as a Holy Foursome?

EN
enjoythemusic
Dec 28, 2021

Yet to try and 'erase' history may be a challenging task. Let's honor history for what it represented °°at the time of inception°°, though also realize this is ~2022 and so we need a version for today's landscape.

SH
sham1
Dec 28, 2021

then it would actually be quite easy - Dufour, Smith and Voutilainen. For me they are head and shoulders above the next three which would be Romain Gauthier, Charles Frodsham and Rexhep Rexhepi. Don't get me wrong - Gauthier, Frodsham and Rexhepi are brilliant but that's how highly I rate Dufour, Smith and Voutilainen. Many independent watchmakers can produce superbly finished watches but these three do it consistently, not sacrificing accuracy and in limited numbers which partly explains their

Advertisement

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 28 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →