
In a thought-provoking discussion, enjoythemusic challenges the long-held notion of the 'Holy Trinity' in horology, arguing that the landscape of mechanical timepieces has dramatically shifted. He invites the WatchProSite community to redefine this esteemed group, focusing specifically on true independent manufacturers. This article synthesizes the community's diverse perspectives on which brands deserve a place in a modern horological pantheon.

That said I don’t think we need to replace the original trinity but maybe it can be rephrased modern independents trinity?
Debethune , Urwerk and MBandF
So we keep the Old-School Trinity, yet have a new Modern Holy Trinity for independents.
Audemars Piguet, Vacheron Constantin and Patek Philippe. Independents aside, maybe we should add A Lange & Sohne as a Holy Foursome?
Yet to try and 'erase' history may be a challenging task. Let's honor history for what it represented °°at the time of inception°°, though also realize this is ~2022 and so we need a version for today's landscape.
then it would actually be quite easy - Dufour, Smith and Voutilainen. For me they are head and shoulders above the next three which would be Romain Gauthier, Charles Frodsham and Rexhep Rexhepi. Don't get me wrong - Gauthier, Frodsham and Rexhepi are brilliant but that's how highly I rate Dufour, Smith and Voutilainen. Many independent watchmakers can produce superbly finished watches but these three do it consistently, not sacrificing accuracy and in limited numbers which partly explains their
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 28 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →