Montblanc Minerva Caliber 16.29 vs 16.31 Comparison
Complications

Montblanc Minerva Caliber 16.29 vs 16.31 Comparison

By jp884 · Apr 21, 2022 · 34 replies
jp884
WPS member · Montblanc forum
34 replies2638 views7 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Jp884 presents a compelling comparison of two Montblanc Minerva chronographs, the 16.29 and 16.31 calibers, through a series of 'quick and dirty' comparison shots. This post offers valuable visual insights into the subtle differences and shared heritage of these highly regarded movements, appealing to collectors who appreciate fine horological distinctions.

34 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →
















Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
LM
lm6
Apr 21, 2022
Amazing pieces! Those movements are a feast for the eyes!

JP
jp884
Apr 21, 2022
Indeed they are, thanks for looking.

DE
dedestexhes
Apr 21, 2022
Thx for these amazing watches. The split second looks smaller on these pictures? Is that the case?

JP
jp884
Apr 21, 2022
They are both 44mm but the split is thicker. I think visually it appears smaller.

They both wear like 42mm watches and are quite comfortable.

DE
dedestexhes
Apr 21, 2022
Thx, like them both.

AM
amanico
Apr 21, 2022
Yes, the Split is 1 mm thicker but it makes a huge difference when you put it side by side with the 1858 Tachymeter.

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Montblanc forum with 34 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →