
quattro's exploration of tourbillon placement, specifically contrasting the Blancpain flying tourbillon with the Laurent Ferrier Classic Tourbillon, sparks a fundamental debate among collectors. This article delves into the aesthetic and horological considerations of displaying this complex mechanism, offering insights into why some prefer it front and center, while others appreciate its discreet elegance on the case back. quattro's personal preference for a clean dial, even when admiring the horological marvel, sets the stage for a nuanced discussion.


Do you know if the small seconds is mounted directly on the tourbillon? I have to assume so. That would make it such an efficient design. EDIT: I have been obsessed by Small Seconds movements, and found this Hodinkee Article a good place to start.
but I’m not certain. Thanks for the article: I will definitely read it !
And this is certainly a top example. Some others are GP, Patek, Journe, JLC (Reverso) and probably some more that I now forget. But clearly, the LF one is top. Certainly in this configuration without the mentioning of the tourbillon on the dial. Thx for sharing, Dirk
It’s unaffordable for me now, but dreaming is nice too! ☺️
From Horage. I haven’t heard any complaints; but I can ask for their experiences if you are interested. Certainly, this Lf example is magnificent.
I didn't even know this brand, so I had to check it out and, on paper, I'm not so fond of their design. So I think I'll just keep dreaming about this LF... But thanks again!
This thread is active on the Independents forum with 39 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →