WPS member · Horological Meandering forum
47 replies8233 views4 photos
In a captivating thread, hl99 invites the WatchProSite community to share their ultimate travel companions, showcasing a personal selection of exquisite timepieces. This discussion delves into the practicalities and pleasures of horology on the go, highlighting watches that combine functionality with distinct aesthetic appeal. Readers will discover how fellow collectors navigate the world with their prized possessions, from robust GMTs to elegant world timers.
Key Points from the Discussion
- The Patek Philippe Aquanaut Ref. 5164a, once a favored travel watch, has become less practical for travel due to its increased market hype and associated security concerns, making it a target for scrutiny or theft.
- The Laurent Ferrier Galet Traveler is highly regarded for its discretion, elegance, and user-friendly adjustment mechanism, making it an ideal choice for international travel where subtlety is preferred.
- While aesthetically pleasing, world timer complications are not always practical for all travelers, with some collectors finding a dual time zone display sufficient for their needs.
- Patek Philippe offers unique travel time options, including the Ref. 5131/1P, a Rare Handcraft world timer, and the Ref. 5269/200R, the brand's first quartz travel time reference, acquired by a collector's girlfriend.
- A Swatch Skin Yellow Jelly, over 20 years old, is highlighted as a surprisingly durable and much-commented-upon travel watch, demonstrating that simplicity and reliability can be key attributes for a globetrotting timepiece.
- Several collectors shared their preferred travel watches, including the Breguet GMT, Bremont MBIII, De Bethune DB25 Starry Varius GMT, Moser Endeavour Dual Time Tourbillon, and Jaeger-LeCoultre Reverso Grande GMT, showcasing a diverse range of complications and styles.
Advertisement
Continue the conversation
This thread is active on the Horological Meandering forum with 47 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →