
K-Lo's recent post on the A. Lange & Söhne Zeitwerk serves as a critical reminder for collectors to factor in long-term ownership costs, particularly servicing, when pursuing secondary market deals. His experience highlights how a seemingly attractive price on a coveted reference can quickly change once maintenance expenses are considered. This discussion is especially pertinent as the market shifts, making due diligence on total cost of ownership more crucial than ever.

I don’t know how this compares to a complicated Patek or RM, for example, but you do highlight an aspect of ownership that not everyone necessarily considers…until they are forced to.
These costs tend to stop me
I am very thankful that I dislike the Lange aesthetic as they seem to be the poster child for how to treat your customers poorly. Their servicing costs for the simple watches seems out of line compared to competitors and that leads me to think that the complicated watch servicing costs are similarly exorbitant. However, I would never buy a Lange after having heard stories from prolific Lange collectors being treated as new to the brand when going to a new Lange Boutique after their AD lost the b
Schmid sounds like his brand is being willfully ignorant. The boxes and papers tell all; his justification won't do.
just a @#$&ing photo of the collection next to todays newspaper😂🤣😆🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
This thread is active on the A. Lange & Söhne forum with 26 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →