
Both Pt and HG versions are nice but this dial is more interesting imo.



Same could be said about the less eaten 3 and 9 on the 1815 chronographs, but the pulsograph seems to ease the imperfection. Like the big date on the original datograph and the eaten Roman numerals. Sometimes imperfections are deal breakers and sometimes they can add some charm. All very subjective but quite fun to discuss.
This thread is active on the A. Lange & Söhne forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →