
Amanico shares his six-year journey with the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Minute Repeater, detailing the difficult decision between the platinum and titanium versions. His personal account offers valuable insights into the nuances of owning such a high-complication timepiece, particularly the impact of case material on wearability and acoustic performance.

I think I am drawn more to the titanium. The dial is even more abstract that the original version, and that appeals to me for this type of watch. I have never hasd either on my wrist, so it would be foolish to state a firm preference, but on initial feeling...titanium
you made the best choice: 1)Titanium looks much cooler for such a sculptural/concept watch 2)Titanium sounds better 3)on such a big watch Titanium takes away a lot of weight(which I like don t get me wrong..)but not in this case.. no doubt the iterations were far too many...they cheapened the product in my opinion. The Ti MMR is the best choice,but......its very very very close to the modern Tivan in the MGT case which I like A LOT!!!!!!!because the case is more smooth and sensual... I don t kno
Agreed on the case of the MGT Ti Van. But I much prefer the dial of my MMR. The best? The Ti Van Case with my MMR dial. For me, at least. Ciao! Nicolas
In the tivan It's more open due to the case shape, therefore the gongs for example are more exposed.... And also the gold accent on hands and markers are the biggest difference.... Mo
I much prefer the original Ti MMR... But this is, of course, very subjective... Best, Nicolas
This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 24 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →