
Amanico's 2012 review of the Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Grande Tradition Minute Repeater in Rose Gold offers a critical comparison to its TiVan predecessor and the Master Minute Repeater. His detailed aesthetic analysis highlights the design choices that make this rose gold iteration particularly compelling, despite his personal preference for white metals in larger watches. This article provides valuable insights into JLC's minute repeater lineage and the subtle nuances that differentiate these haute horlogerie pieces.
A very breathtaking watch,i agree that the chromatic contrast here plays a big difference,it makes the RG MMR look somehow...old. This is definitely an improvement and from a collecting point of view makes it a desirable golden marvel. My concern is about wearability,rose gold is the most in your face type of gold ,a very loud material.On such a big watch it will take a lot of determination to make the decision to wear it.Depending on the person ,you could pull it off,but the long term wearabili
I don't like them, except if they are small and thin. So, I will always prefer the white metal cases, for big watches, and undisputably, this MGT MR or the MMR, is a big watch. One thing is that I prefer this one to the TiVan sister, and to the RG MMR. I feel it is better thought, conceived. Now, between the Ti MMR and this RG MGT MR, I much prefer the Ti. A point you raised is the excluvity. I am sorry to say that given the sophisticated complication, the Minute Repeater ala JLC is not an exclu
I do not really understand,it seems like they enjoy bringing damage to themselves. I appreciate that the brands provides every kind of watch for every kind of price but their exclusive range should be more looked after....now for example I can see dozens and dozens of Duometre around....doesn t diminish my love for the brand or the watches but,they should be more careful. One last question,would you like the Tivan more if hands and markers were silver? Mo
The Duometre doesn't have the ambition to be a limited edition, except some YG and WG versions. And I have no problems seeing different iterations, housing different complications, in the Duometre Family. Where I am less comfortable is to see two different sizes of the same Duometre ( the QL ). Is there an evidence that: 1/ It had to get a 40, 5 mm case? 2/ The 40, 5 mm is " superflu "? The Duometre is not in the same financial league than the MMR, or MGT MR. Being less exclusive, the Duometre i
but a strong line for JLC haute horologerie...Other brands would have treated it differently. Mo
With a better distribution... I agree. Best, Nicolas
This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 22 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →