
amanico's post shines a spotlight on the Jaeger-LeCoultre WWW, a vintage military watch celebrated for its distinctive character and historically significant Caliber 479 movement. This article offers an in-depth look at a beloved piece of JLC's heritage, inviting readers to appreciate its unique design and mechanical artistry.
Thank you for the great photos! I'm already in for the Tribute ... Have a good weekend!
A lot of homework and researches to do, and a lot of efforts to spend, but at the end you will discover a wide and wonderful world, clever, brilliant, original and sometimes beautiful. I wish you a lot of pleasure, here. Best, Hermano. Nicolas.
Hello Nicolas, Your JLC WWW really has a great case and no doubt that it has the style and character of this matt finish case..... Different variants of JLC WWW For me, I still have perferenec about pilot watches, probably its unique movement, and its antimagnetic design... Enjoy and Happy 2012!!! Best regards, Hans
As I also had the luxury to see those 3 JLC- Militaries in real, my friend - what a pleasure again for these re-visited vistas now ! ( also took the opportunity to re- read your lovely, extensive 3 reviews about those, BTW) I do remember it's strong,(in a way no-nonsense, but still charming) presence on a very specific 666- wrist, - this combo of the black dial, plus subdial, the radium indices and cathedral hands is quite captivating.. - Although, maybe if I would have one single personal choic
Mark XI RAAF, RAF, Cathedral hands, or baton, WWW with the same diversity of hands, My God! That is what I call dedication to these watches. I am so happy you came out ouff the wood, Hans. Bravo, and a huge thanks. Nicolas
Among them, the WWW and the Mark XI are my favourites, but I can't resist to the appeal of a Weems or a Mark 7 A. Step by step, you will end with all of them, I know that. Taking breaths? Who said that? Best, my dear friend. Nicolas.
This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 30 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.
Join the Discussion →