Jaeger-LeCoultre Ultra-Thin Movements History
Complications

Jaeger-LeCoultre Ultra-Thin Movements History

By amanico · Apr 23, 2012 · 41 replies
amanico
WPS member · Jaeger-LeCoultre forum
41 replies24683 views0 photos
f 𝕏 in 💬 🔗

Amanico's comprehensive post, "The Genealogical tree of the Ulra Thin movements," offers an invaluable historical overview of Jaeger-LeCoultre's mastery in ultra-thin calibers. This detailed exploration highlights the intricate balance between thinness and reliability, showcasing JLC's enduring legacy in this challenging horological domain. His work serves as a crucial reference for understanding the evolution and significance of these remarkable movements.

41 collectors discussing this on the WatchProSite forumJoin the Conversation →


Making an ultra thin movement is much more difficult than you can think.

There is a very tough compromise to find the perfect ratio between the thinness, and the reliability, the solidity of the parts composing the movement.

LeCoultre, then Jaeger-Lecoultre developped a true speciality and mastery in ultra thin movements, since 1907, which were manual but also automatic.

Here, you will find a list of these movements, which are true piece of art, and, sometimes, offered more than simply the Hour and the Minutes, but some prestigious complications, like a Minute Repeater.

I/ Manual movements:

Cal 145 from 1907.... 1, 38 mm high!





Cal 18 SMV, circa 1920, Minute Repeater, AND Ultra Thin. Even if I don't have the height of this movement, I have seen in the real life, and I can vouch for its thinness:





Cal 803, 1953.... 1, 64 mm high.





Cal 818, 1959: 2, 94 mm high.





Cal 849, 1994: 1, 85 mm high.



II/ Automatic movements:

Cal 920, from 1967: 2, 45 mm high, made by Jaeger-Lecoultre, used by Audemars Piguet and Vacheron Constantin, for example.





Cal 896, from 2008: 3, 98 mm high, but does it have still to be considered as Ultra Thin?



Who else is able to offer such a diversity?

Best,

Nicolas

Key Points from the Discussion

Advertisement
The Discussion
WA
watchme
Apr 23, 2012
Great beginning....

It'd be great to see how many of the JLC UT movements were supplied to PP, since PP didn't make a movement before 1933, and were still VERY reliant on JLC's expertise in this areas right through the late '80s. Thanks for the post. -Dean

DR
dreamer8
Apr 23, 2012
The JLC developed 920 was used by PP

for the Nautilus ( PP 28-255 ) when it debuted in 1970 for ten years before it was replaced by the PP 335 SC. AP bought the rights to the movement and is still used in the AP RO 15202 . Corrections welcomed as I am going by memory. Cheers,dreamer This message has been edited by dreamer8 on 2012-04-23 20:08:01

AM
amanico
Apr 24, 2012
W!hat I wondered, while preparing this post, is to know that

I didn't forget a few others... Not evolutions, but different ones. As for the JLC UT movements housed in other brands watches... JLC is pretty discrete on that point. And we have to compare what the others offer to have an element of answer... Best, Nicolas

TI
Tick Talk
Apr 23, 2012
Thanks Nicolas, and a question...

I'm very interested in learning more about the calibers 803 and 920. As mentioned, they were assigned to other manufactures but your pictures show them decorated with JLC markings. Were they used by JLC? If yes, in what models? This message has been edited by Tick Talk on 2012-04-23 06:31:06

WA
watchme
Apr 24, 2012
Hi, Tick-Talk...

The 803 was funded by AP & VC and both brands debuted "The thinnest movement" in the year it was released (1953?). Both brands are using it today, although I believe AP owns the rights to it (part of the purchase agreement of Richemont buying AP's shares in JLC back in 2000/2001). The 920 was, likewise, funded by AP & VC. PP may have contributed (this I don't know) to the development, but all 3 have used it and JLC has not. For a more detailed review of the 920, TZ has a link under Resources

AM
amanico
Apr 24, 2012
No they weren't used by JLC for their watches.

They were delivered to AP and VC in parts, ready to be assembled. Best, Nicolas

Continue the conversation

This thread is active on the Jaeger-LeCoultre forum with 41 replies. Share your knowledge with fellow collectors.

Join the Discussion →